Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pets

hlthe2b

(109,826 posts)

3. One would hope, but marketers of a 'non-surgical, non-invasive solution" would likely drown

Reply to hermetic (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:27 PM

Oct 2023

out the "but...." of their well-meaning and knowledgeable veterinarians--especially once the internet and social media"experts" get involved.

Still, I'm hopeful. Like I said, I see this as invaluable--not only in feral cats but potentially other species eventually as well.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Great news for cats! [View all] hermetic Oct 2023 OP

Goodnews for feral cats; domestic cats will no longer be protected against life-threatening uterine hlthe2b Oct 2023 #1

Well sure hermetic Oct 2023 #2

One would hope, but marketers of a 'non-surgical, non-invasive solution" would likely drown hlthe2b Oct 2023 #3

This has scary implications for forced sterilization in humans.... getagrip_already Oct 2023 #4

The ferals still need to be trapped. The article doesn't spell out if one shot lasts a lifetime. One Karadeniz Oct 2023 #5