Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pro-Choice

(19,382 posts)

1. This should have been discussed before the election.

Mon Aug 21, 2023, 11:47 AM

Aug 2023

Now they have a veto proof majority and can do whatever they want. The timing of the issue to late after the election. What can they do?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Gigantic step backwards': far-right gains in Chile threaten abortion rights [View all] Eugene Aug 2023 OP

This should have been discussed before the election. jimfields33 Aug 2023 #1