Pro-Choice

unblock

(55,400 posts)

7. "violate your sincerely held religious beliefs or get out of the pharmacy business"?

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 05:14 PM

Jun 2016

alito says this as if sincerely held religious beliefs should come at no cost.

hey, the amish sincerely believe in avoiding technology. must we bend over backwards to let them fly planes or drive trucks while refusing to operate modern technology?

some accommodation for religious beliefs may be reasonable, but others not. generally, it's when those religious beliefs have an unreasonable adverse impact on others that the line is crossed. preventing or delaying women from having access to medicine is clearly one of those lines.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Divided Supreme Court rejects family pharmacy's religious claim [View all] Eugene Jun 2016 OP

As it should be, elleng Jun 2016 #1

Inasmuch as religious liberty claims are bullshit (they are not about religious liberty) we should immoderate Jun 2016 #2

So if they disapproved of all contraceptives they could refuse to sell them? yellowcanine Jun 2016 #3

screw wallyworld2 Jun 2016 #4

Good! ananda Jun 2016 #5

Religion has no meaningful place in the public realm Moostache Jun 2016 #6

"violate your sincerely held religious beliefs or get out of the pharmacy business"? unblock Jun 2016 #7

"If God had meant for us to fly, he'd have given us wings. BTW, Ilsa Jun 2016 #8

Xray tech here.... Scruffy Rumbler Jun 2016 #9

Or, "there's no point in you getting a PET scan, etc, Ilsa Jun 2016 #10