Feminists

William769

(55,783 posts)

63. justiceischeap

Reply to justiceischeap (Original post)

Thu Feb 16, 2012, 12:40 PM

Feb 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My thoughts on Neoma's actions (as if they matter at all) [View all] justiceischeap Feb 2012 OP

You are wrong in your third paragraph boston bean Feb 2012 #1

It's nice to know those are the only facts you dispute. justiceischeap Feb 2012 #2

No, that is one I know for a fact that is wrong. boston bean Feb 2012 #4

Did I once link to anything you said? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #7

Hello, I wrote the post, calling for the new election. boston bean Feb 2012 #10

this is where the problem arises. you can now say this forever more and it will still come back to seabeyond Feb 2012 #11

To both Boston Bean and Seabeyond justiceischeap Feb 2012 #14

we had an election just a month ago. it stayed open for a couple weeks. redqueen was elected hands seabeyond Feb 2012 #15

I'm aware of all of this sea justiceischeap Feb 2012 #17

yes. see how wrong i was. seabeyond Feb 2012 #18

What about what Neoma has done? boston bean Feb 2012 #19

Wow, do you even know my name? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #23

No, I am not angry, boston bean Feb 2012 #24

I've not knowingly attributed anything to you but anger justiceischeap Feb 2012 #26

What you are saying here was said in the post, but the reasoning was different than boston bean Feb 2012 #16

What you seem to be missing is I made two separate statements about the elections justiceischeap Feb 2012 #20

I try to go to the source of a problem boston bean Feb 2012 #21

Or we can look at the other side of the penny justiceischeap Feb 2012 #25

She is locking threads. She has that power. boston bean Feb 2012 #28

Darnit! You caught me... justiceischeap Feb 2012 #29

The distrust of her was made clear by members of the group. boston bean Feb 2012 #30

you cannot just create a story that there was lack of trust, without some kind of reasoning for seabeyond Feb 2012 #31

I'm not the one creating narratives justiceischeap Feb 2012 #32

And I am stating the fact boston bean Feb 2012 #34

i could say the moon is blue, that is why i.... there was no reasons for her not to trust us seabeyond Feb 2012 #35

Here is one possible reason for that distrust Lisa D Feb 2012 #33

Seems to me that neoma boston bean Feb 2012 #36

I don't read it the same way. Lisa D Feb 2012 #40

that post that she was so right about was hidden by a jury. boston bean Feb 2012 #44

I'm talking about the post Lisa D Feb 2012 #51

me too, I am talking about the post off site. boston bean Feb 2012 #53

we had a number of members and host suggest trickster get blocked. he has a number of seabeyond Feb 2012 #37

I think there's enough unreasonableness to go around justiceischeap Feb 2012 #41

I never said you were unreasonable Lisa D Feb 2012 #42

if she refuses to adhere to SoP, if she refuses to listen to co hosts and members, if she suggests seabeyond Feb 2012 #45

When did she refuse to adhere to the SOP? Lisa D Feb 2012 #58

i agree with iverglas' post that you quoted. Scout Feb 2012 #39

So iverglas gets to decide Lisa D Feb 2012 #46

No a jury decided to. boston bean Feb 2012 #47

Well, if we're basing whether or not Lisa D Feb 2012 #56

No, that is not true and not what I implied or said. boston bean Feb 2012 #57

And I'm not saying I necessarily agree Lisa D Feb 2012 #59

Who cares. she said it in confidence to the host herself. boston bean Feb 2012 #60

It wasn't in confidence Lisa D Feb 2012 #62

And she has taken unilateral actions. boston bean Feb 2012 #64

And I ask again. Lisa D Feb 2012 #65

to keep on discussing. not go behind their backs boston bean Feb 2012 #67

So what I hear you saying is... justiceischeap Feb 2012 #66

neoma unilaterally removed a co-host and blocked her from the group. boston bean Feb 2012 #68

She's said it a few times now. Specifically used the term unilaterally justiceischeap Feb 2012 #69

whatever, it doesn't make neoma's actions boston bean Feb 2012 #70

I believe I've said that justiceischeap Feb 2012 #71

I don't recall you asking me that.. boston bean Feb 2012 #72

That's okay, there's been a lot of back and forth justiceischeap Feb 2012 #73

backtracking is never fun snooper2 Feb 2012 #38

It's a little known fact - but "calling out" people is not against the TOS in DU3 kdmorris Feb 2012 #3

Thank you for welcoming me justiceischeap Feb 2012 #5

one of my sins, per neoma, is i quoted a poster that called us "fucking bigots". jury allowed seabeyond Feb 2012 #6

Is this for kdmorris or me? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #8

poster said no name calling, calling out allowed. yes, i was speaking to kdmorris. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #9

It's not because you disagree with me, Seabeyond kdmorris Feb 2012 #12

because i disagree with you, or others i am feeding the flames. yet, for people that hold a seabeyond Feb 2012 #13

"cannot allow anyone to fabricate a story for personal gains" kdmorris Feb 2012 #22

this would be an example of what i am talking about. "i have not tied my star to anyone." seabeyond Feb 2012 #27

Sigh.. kdmorris Feb 2012 #43

you will hear me correct nontruths. in you perception that is defending her. in mine, seabeyond Feb 2012 #48

Would you like me to post links to the offsite group hosts forum? kdmorris Feb 2012 #49

i am not running away from wht was posted on the site. i am stating, your interpretation seabeyond Feb 2012 #50

Emphasis Mine kdmorris Feb 2012 #54

sea, when I state the iverglas seems to have an issue with LGBT group justiceischeap Feb 2012 #52

yes... i think you both have an issue with each other. equally. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #55

I've openly admitted I have an issue with her justiceischeap Feb 2012 #61

justiceischeap William769 Feb 2012 #63