My thoughts on Neoma's actions (as if they matter at all)

[kdmorris]

43. Sigh..

"on edit... it seems to me, what you are saying, if i dont accept this misrepresentation, if i point out where i think the statement is incorrect, i am flaming, fighting. what am i supose to do other than correct where i see a wrong?"

No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that you defend iverglas even when people are saying true things about her.

She called a human being "it" on the off-site board.
She called for blocking people from the group because they were joking about her... and you agreed.
She suggested that you all "be done with this place" and go back to DU2. While you did tell her "not yet", the implication was that you agreed with her and would at some point in the future, welcome a return to DU2.

etc.

That makes you biased and furthermore, the fact that she is your friend and you don't want bad things to be said about her makes you biased so that you cannot seem to tell when someone IS telling the truth because of your loyalty to her.

Because of that loyalty and inability to think critically about things that are said about her, it makes you too biased to be a host, IN MY OPINION (which is NOT the only opinion that matters). You will remember that this was NOT my opinion the other day, when I actually did vote for you to be co-host, but your postings since then have changed my mind.

Not really sure where I said you had failure and doom, but OK...