Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,489 posts)
3. We recently had a fossil fuel sales guy around here rebranding them as "hydrogen" who liked to post obscene pictures...
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 02:47 PM
Saturday

...of solar facilities in China, including floating facilities on bodies of water. (This was part of the bait and switch scheme taking advantage of the fact that people actually still believe solar energy is "green" despite lots of evidence to the contrary.)

The fact is that solar cells are mass and area intensive and relatively short lived. I regard them largely as consumer junk. The subsidies supporting them are subsidiaries to wealthy people, people who can afford to own homes, as opposed to people who cannot afford homes. They have a waste problem on a scale of millions upon millions of metric tons.

They may be of limited utility in certain cases, I agree, but they are not now, never have been, and never will be as sustainable and as clean as nuclear energy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Amount of New Solar P...»Reply #3