Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,802 posts)
6. I am sorry if you're offended by my simple statement of a fact.
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 11:48 AM
Thursday

Most of the world's primary energy, roughly 80% consistently over many decades is generated using dangerous fossil fuels.

This said, to your point, it is definitely true that if one were to desire to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, capture from seawater is thermodyamically superior to the much studied direct air capture.

On the energy beat one does here a lot of rhetoric that amounts to perpetual motion machines.

Dr. Willauer's work, which I have followed many years in the primary scientific literature is based on the input of necessary primary energy to create a cyclic system that does not reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, whereas the use to which you have pointed in theory does, coming in under the rubric of CCU, carbon capture and use. In this sense, what you point to is environmentally superior.

The primary energy utilized in Dr. Willauer's work is nuclear. It is designed to generate jet fuel at sea on nuclear powered aircraft carriers. This closed system would not remove carbon dioxide overall, but would result in eliminating additions to the atmosphere when utilized.

Succinyl based polyesters by contrast would effective remove CO2 sequestering by use. This is obviously a superior approach.

I do appreciate your point but in the ongoing climate disaster, one needs to be clear on the distinctions. The laws of thermodynamics dictate that there is no free lunch.

I did not mean to offend you by commenting on your interesting post.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»World's first reactor con...»Reply #6