Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

applegrove

(126,983 posts)

3. Thanks for your perspective. Much easier to clean up

Reply to NNadir (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:59 AM

Friday

solar than nuclear waste (that has to be buried for like 70,000 years and how many spent rods will successive nuclear plants need to dump in 70,000 years). Yes no gas is the goal. Good news is cold fushion seems to be closer to reality.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Great, hopefull, article: [View all] applegrove Jul 17 OP

Solar is a big contributor. usonian Jul 17 #1

Some sort of energy storage is required OKIsItJustMe Friday #5

I am in the Sierra foothills and my energy costs are really minimal usonian Friday #6

Actually, during the "Oil Crisis" (some) oil companies were looking to renewables OKIsItJustMe Friday #7

I thought of wind power in winter (those storms!) but again, not cost-effective for a small user like me. usonian Friday #8

"Manufactured homes" are a bit like utility-scale solar OKIsItJustMe Friday #9

Well, this is an interesting line of a bullshit designed to obscure reality. The data is readily available from... NNadir Friday #2

Thanks for your perspective. Much easier to clean up applegrove Friday #3

Nonsense. So called "nuclear waste" hasn't killed anyone in this country and the garbage thinking to the contrary.... NNadir Friday #4