Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,466 posts)
16. "What it will do is ensure our dependency on natural gas power plants" -- No it won't
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 08:06 PM
Feb 2021
What it will do is ensure our dependency on natural gas power plants whenever the wind isn't blowing.


This is pure B.S. Hunter. And you apparently missed the part of the OP on battery and hydrogen storage.

We've been through this before, many times. Just to take a couple such examples.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127137444
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127139858

If it wasn't for wind and solar, there would be MORE MWh generated from fossil fuel, not less.

I was an electrical engineer working in an electric utility in generation planning and superintendent in operational planning. But one doesn't need that experience or degree to know this.

And don't give me a lot of bubbly boo about the safe cheap modular nuclear designs just around the corner. We canNOT afford to wait and wait and wait for them. We really can't wait. I've been hearing a lot of wild cheering and bubbly boo about them for more than 50 years. But so far lots of "hat" but no cattle.

When those fantastic nukes come along, realize they are being designed to work well with heavily wind- and solar- systems, at least from what I've read from NuScale and Terrapower.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good move. Lunabell Feb 2021 #1
Bezos is no longer CEO. Budi Feb 2021 #2
This was towards Amazon. Lunabell Feb 2021 #3
So was this post about the ingenuity of 'The Crosswind' Budi Feb 2021 #4
What's your point? Lunabell Feb 2021 #5
The point is the nature of the article. Budi Feb 2021 #6
Oh I'm sure he has no more input Bradshaw3 Feb 2021 #7
Ya, who cares about global climate anyway. Just hate Bezos. Budi Feb 2021 #8
Post removed Post removed Feb 2021 #19
The OP is in the Energy Forum because it's the subject of the article Budi Feb 2021 #20
Bezos wasn't even mentioned in the OP and was just casually referred to in the linked article..... George II Feb 2021 #10
You didn't read the article did you. No where does it address what the cost was to Bezos Budi Feb 2021 #12
You didn't read what I wrote, did you? Bradshaw3 Feb 2021 #18
I did read what you wrote & chose to 🙄 since it's off topic for the Energy Forum Budi Feb 2021 #21
Unbelievable that a good news story about something positive being done has to be pissed on.... George II Feb 2021 #9
Thanks. How can anyone diss the global climate innovation of this Project. Budi Feb 2021 #11
I am amazed also Gothmog Feb 2021 #13
This is good news. brer cat Feb 2021 #14
Wind energy isn't going to save the world. hunter Feb 2021 #15
"What it will do is ensure our dependency on natural gas power plants" -- No it won't progree Feb 2021 #16
Thank you! I found this part especially encouraging too, from an ... Budi Feb 2021 #17
Europe has an extensive network of transmission lines Finishline42 Feb 2021 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Amazon Moves On Its Large...»Reply #16