Photography

Ferrets are Cool

(22,419 posts)

1. Speaking from my 34 years of being a professional AND being mirrorless for the last

Thu Sep 8, 2022, 07:03 AM

Sep 2022

12 years, I cannot find ANY negatives to the myriad of mirrorless cameras I have used. They have ALL been Sony's, so my viewpoint may be skewed, but I would NEVER use a mirrored camera again.
I can shoot at very high ISO's and experience so little grain.
I am a real estate photographer. On occasion, I need to shoot houses with no power. In those cases, I usually shoot at 1600 or 3200 ISO. TBH, I cannot tell the difference between those and when I shoot my normal 320 ISO.
Hope this helps.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question about mirrorless [View all] Old Crank Sep 2022 OP

Speaking from my 34 years of being a professional AND being mirrorless for the last Ferrets are Cool Sep 2022 #1

"I cannot tell the difference between those and when I shoot my normal 320 ISO. " mitch96 Sep 2022 #3

Not the answer you are looking for... I am a good photographer, not a great photographer. 3Hotdogs Sep 2022 #2

Owned a Sony A7R3 for three years and OMG YES!! What you see is what you get viewfinder. IA8IT Sep 2022 #4

I can't imagine what the issue might be. AndyS Sep 2022 #5

The biggest issue is the use of legacy lenses Major Nikon Sep 2022 #6

focus peaking solves that moonshinegnomie Sep 2022 #8

So do all the manual DSLRs Major Nikon Sep 2022 #11

i use both. a nikon d850 and a sony a7iii moonshinegnomie Sep 2022 #7

Interesting comments Old Crank Sep 2022 #9

I'm shooting with Sony A7-R4 mirrorless, full-frame .. Bo Zarts Sep 2022 #10

if they meant visibility in the VF, then a mirrorless should be better in low light situations... Gato Moteado Sep 2022 #12

Good summary! ManiacJoe Sep 2022 #13

I've been taking pictures for more than fifty years. Grumpy Old Guy Sep 2022 #14