Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopdiggin

(14,467 posts)
3. almost dismantles the nature vs nurture debate
Sun Oct 16, 2022, 11:25 PM
Oct 2022

although this man tries (mightily, yet largely unconvincingly) to buttress the argument for 'environment.' "Nobody grows up in the same family." Which is clever ... But also a bit of flummery.

I think most, reasonable, accountings end up going with a (hugely complex) admixture of the two (nature/nurture) - with both (in most instances) having accepted weight and influence. But, the (acknowledged) disparities between sibling circumstances, becomes a fairly tepid explanation in relation to the wildly different outcomes in personality, temperament, pathology .... In a word - it's weak sauce.

But the argument (or prejudice) that I think is most effectively destroyed - is the simple minded and dogged insistence (across the board) of "it's the parents .. " "parents are to blame .. " and yada, yada. You've all heard it. And way too often.

Nope. That ain't the way it works. ------ ---- -----------

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»How can siblings be raise...»Reply #3