Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 06:02 PM Mar 2014

NASA-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'? [View all]

A new study sponsored by Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center has highlighted the prospect that global industrial civilisation could collapse in coming decades due to unsustainable resource exploitation and increasingly unequal wealth distribution.

Noting that warnings of 'collapse' are often seen to be fringe or controversial, the study attempts to make sense of compelling historical data showing that "the process of rise-and-collapse is actually a recurrent cycle found throughout history." Cases of severe civilisational disruption due to "precipitous collapse - often lasting centuries - have been quite common."

The research project is based on a new cross-disciplinary 'Human And Nature DYnamical' (HANDY) model, led by applied mathematician Safa Motesharri of the US National Science Foundation-supported National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, in association with a team of natural and social scientists. The study based on the HANDY model has been accepted for publication in the peer-reviewed Elsevier journal, Ecological Economics.

It finds that according to the historical record even advanced, complex civilisations are susceptible to collapse, raising questions about the sustainability of modern civilisation:

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No surprises here. n/t RKP5637 Mar 2014 #1
Well I'll be gone. I think I lived during our golden years upaloopa Mar 2014 #2
Well, nobody promised that you'd like the "Change," now, did they?!?! blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #3
Yeah except when we collapse this time we kill the planet boomer55 Mar 2014 #4
The planet is fully capable of looking after itself dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #5
Not that we're going to disappear anytime soon.....at least not due to AGW, anyway. nt AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #12
I don't agree boomer55 Mar 2014 #14
Earliest forms of life were over 3 billion years ago dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #17
Could be very interesting, really. Pity we won't be there to see it. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #19
Maybe whatever replaces us will have more sense. dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #20
One can hope. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #21
With billions of people, we probably could cprise Mar 2014 #6
If I've said it once I've said it a hundred times 4dsc Mar 2014 #7
Oswald Spengler - The Decline of the West bananas Mar 2014 #8
I agree, bvar22 Mar 2014 #9
its called exponential growth TimeToEvolve Mar 2014 #10
If this is what NASA's putting out these days.....I fear for their future.(Thanks GOP!) AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #11
It's an important part of the Drake Equation bananas Mar 2014 #15
There was no quantifiable reference to Drake that I could see. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #18
Recommend jsr Mar 2014 #13
K & R. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2014 #16
As if anyone gives a shit. Redfairen Mar 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»NASA-funded study: indust...