Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ancianita

(43,392 posts)
Mon May 25, 2026, 01:00 PM Monday

Why So Few Babies? We Might Have Overlooked the Biggest Reason of All [View all]

By Anna Louie Sussman

... overall, people are having fewer children both in countries that offer very little and in those renowned for their generous family benefits; moreover, the trend holds among those who are struggling to make ends meet and among those who, like the Riveras, have advanced degrees and salaried jobs. What unites these disparate cultures, policy environments and demographics, researchers are now realizing, is young people’s inescapable and crushing sense that the future is too uncertain for the lifelong commitment of parenthood. Call it the vibes theory of demographic decline.

The future has never been assured, but it feels as though we are living in a time of spectacular uncertainty. In the United States, job tenures have contracted and income volatility has risen. Life expectancy, once on an inexorable march upward, has fallen for less-educated women and men. Many of the forces our economy is built on — A.I., immigration, global trade — feel distressingly volatile; disruption, once a byword for a disturbance or problem, is the governing ethos of a terrifyingly powerful sector of our economy. The rise of prediction markets has turned the world into one large casino. The climate crisis is spiraling, as are the costs of everything that could enable parenthood, whether that’s a roof over one’s head or child care. The past half-century has brought us breathtaking inequality, accompanied by a sharp decline in social mobility. The two generations currently of childbearing age bear the psychological and financial scars of coming of age amid world-scale catastrophes: Older millennials entered the labor market during the Great Recession; many watched their parents lose their jobs or homes. Members of Gen Z, whose lives were upturned by the Covid-19 pandemic, now find themselves competing against A.I. for entry-level jobs and even prospective partners. The man running America seems single-mindedly devoted to chaos at home and abroad...

No existing demographic theory could explain the near uniformity of this decline across the continent, which continued irrespective of how deeply a country was affected by the recession or how swiftly it recovered. It became clear to Mr. Vignoli that structural factors such as employment status or the housing market, while important context, do not tell the whole story of where people see themselves in the future. Raising children is an inherently forward-looking project, and in Professor Vignoli’s analysis, increasing exposure to a volatile global economy and accelerating technological change make it hard for young people to project a path forward with even a modest degree of confidence...

Even proponents of the uncertainty theory acknowledge that there are plenty of other factors that contribute to the world’s declining birthrates. There has been a marked decline in marriage. Increased social isolation, to say nothing of what some have called a “sex recession,” certainly does not augur a baby boom. Nor do today’s employment prospects. Educated workers face what the economist Claudia Goldin has called “greedy jobs,” positions that demand far more of an employee than can be contained between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., while less-skilled workers cope with unpredictable shifts and wages that have barely kept pace with the cost of living. It’s hard to square either with the expectation that parents will invest huge amounts of time and money in their children’s development...Look hard enough, though, and many of those factors become forms of uncertainty too....

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/07/opinion/birthrate-kids-parents-demographics-future.html?unlocked_article_code=1.lFA.dvDj.9jMGEPpxjB8W&smid=url-share

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even if I were inclined to have wanted kids, FoxNewsSucks Monday #1
Totally understandable. Yours is the same reason my youngest son refuses to ever have children. ancianita Monday #2
Yep. I felt that way 45 years ago. Auggie Monday #3
The reason for so few babies is that people can now plan their families and avoid unwanted pregnancies. Midnight Writer Monday #4
Maybe to some extent, but hope or no hope for the near future seems to matter greatly Attilatheblond Monday #6
We had our two sons when Bill Clinton was President. We wouldn't do so now, were we young enough to do so. NNadir Monday #5
Understood. Were I young I'd note the international numbers and seriously consider doing the same. ancianita Monday #11
I have always told right to lifers randr Monday #7
Amen, amen! ancianita Monday #8
George Carlin's description of pro-forced birthers, oops, right-to-lifers: niyad Monday #10
I was very fortunate to come of age when The Pill was becoming niyad Monday #9
It takes two incomes in many cases just to pay for rent, car, living expenses. Diamond_Dog Monday #12
I think AI is in the background, being used for jobs humans used to do, men included. Though AI will never surpass human ancianita Monday #13
My grandson decided at the age of twenty-two that he was never going to have kids. Aristus Monday #14
It is because women now have a choice to say "no" to men and their institutions. valleyrogue Monday #15
yup Skittles Monday #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why So Few Babies? We Mig...