Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(137,470 posts)
Tue May 19, 2026, 03:41 PM Tuesday

Slush Fund for Felons: Trump's $1.766B Payoff Plan [View all]

Frank Figliuzzi

On Monday, we learned President Trump withdrew his family’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service. The suit stemmed from the leak, by an IRS consultant, of confidential tax return documents filed by Trump and his family. That consultant also divulged data to various media outlets about other rich Americans. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison.

Experts complained that the lawsuit posed serious conflict concerns with a president suing an agency he oversees and possibly approving an outrageously exorbitant settlement for himself. While that might have been preposterous, reports of the dropped suit were quickly followed by even more disturbing news of how that case was settled: Trump’s DOJ established a $1.8 billion fund to compensate Americans who, like Trump, assert they are victims of a “weaponized” justice system.

Trump’s decision to drop his suit probably wasn’t some magnanimous gesture grounded in concern over pillaging the public coffers for his own enrichment. More likely, his advisors briefed him on the judge’s questions about the propriety of the case and on the odds that Trump would suffer yet another courtroom loss.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, presiding over the case in Miami, queried whether there was any real legal difference between the plaintiff — Trump, and the IRS — led by Trump. Judge Williams questioned whether the parties were “sufficiently adverse” to genuinely oppose each other. In other words, even though private citizen Trump brought the lawsuit, President Trump might be telling the IRS and the DOJ what to do. The judge wrote, “he is the sitting president, and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction.”

https://www.lincolnsquare.media/p/slush-fund-for-felons-trumps-1766b

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Slush Fund for Felons: Tr...