Greg Palast: I met Chavez and Maduro. I know drugs are not the reason Trump wants war with Venezuela

[JoseBalow]

34. Google is in drumpf's pocket. DuckDuckGo says this...

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=what+does+Project+2025+say+about+Venezuela%3F

Project 2025 emphasizes the need for the next U.S. administration to take significant steps against Venezuela's government, which it describes as "Communist abusers," while also aiming to support the Venezuelan people. The initiative suggests a focus on reshaping U.S. foreign policy towards Venezuela, potentially including measures to pressure the current regime. fullertonobserver.com whatisproject2025.net

Overview of Project 2025's Stance on Venezuela

Project 2025, initiated by the Heritage Foundation, outlines a strategy for U.S. foreign policy regarding Venezuela. It emphasizes a strong stance against the current Venezuelan government, led by Nicolás Maduro, which it characterizes as authoritarian and abusive.

Key Points on Venezuela

Policy Recommendations
Regime Change: The project advocates for actions that would put pressure on the Maduro regime, suggesting that the U.S. should take significant steps to address the situation in Venezuela.

Support for the Venezuelan People: It calls for measures to assist the Venezuelan population suffering under the current government, although specific strategies are not detailed.

Comparison to Authoritarianism
Centralization of Power: Project 2025's approach has drawn parallels to tactics used by Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, such as centralizing power and undermining democratic institutions. Critics argue that the project reflects a similar trend of consolidating executive authority in the U.S.

Broader Implications
Democratic Backsliding: Experts warn that the strategies proposed in Project 2025 could lead to a decrease in democratic engagement in the U.S., mirroring the erosion of democracy seen in Venezuela.

In summary, Project 2025 presents a critical view of the Venezuelan government and suggests a need for U.S. intervention while raising concerns about the implications of its own strategies for democracy at home.