Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

70sEraVet

(4,925 posts)
2. The 'junk science' phrase used in the article, seems to be, as you say, diagnosing with certainty.
Sun Sep 24, 2023, 08:41 PM
Sep 2023

"In 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the world’s leading pediatric medical organization, issued official guidance. It said that where a young child had internal head injuries there was “the need for a presumption of child abuse” – a categoric finding that rapidly became medical, and then forensic dogma."

No one saw him shake the child. There seems to have been no evidence that he had ever harmed the child previously. He's been sentence to die solely because of the evidence of the internal head injury.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»I'm afraid that this man'...»Reply #2