Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: These 2020 hopefuls are courting Wall Street. Don't be fooled by their progressive veneer [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)6. I'm so tired of all these posts about Democrats getting money from "Wall Street". The fact is....
....NO ONE can give more than the FEC limit, not a bank executive, bank teller, maintenance worker, etc. NO ONE! That piece is loaded with falsehoods and incorrect innuendos. But I guess it served it's purpose.
Obviously the Guardian writer has very little understanding of American campaign finance laws.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
These 2020 hopefuls are courting Wall Street. Don't be fooled by their progressive veneer [View all]
DrFunkenstein
Jan 2019
OP
I'm so tired of all these posts about Democrats getting money from "Wall Street". The fact is....
George II
Jan 2019
#6
Right or Wrong I think the reality is that it takes money to win a Presidential election. It is
still_one
Jan 2019
#37
Clerical workers, factory workers, maintenance, housekeeping, tellers, bookkeepers, etc.....
George II
Jan 2019
#97
Remember when we discovered that Russians were trying to divide the Democratic Party?
pepperbear
Jan 2019
#28
He clearly has an agenda, and that agenda is not supporting the American Democratic Party.
George II
Jan 2019
#17
yup, he also considers himself a Markist and an anti-capitalist. The Democratic party believes
still_one
Jan 2019
#22
Another anti-Democratic hit piece. What's the point of this? Not only that, it's a week old....
George II
Jan 2019
#5
The article from the Guardian is loaded with falsehoods. Nothing short of a Democratic hit piece.
George II
Jan 2019
#11
So what? Is that your litmus test? The important thing is where do they stand on the issues?
still_one
Jan 2019
#14
One of our "leading" candidates has more than half of his reported net worth invested in....
George II
Jan 2019
#20
Hell, nearly all of my net worth is invested in mutual funds... does that make me bad?
groundloop
Jan 2019
#56
NO politician can accept money from the "financial system", fettered or unfettered.
George II
Jan 2019
#24
You can't serve 2 masters. If you solicit "big money", you take their interests.
pdsimdars
Jan 2019
#26
What do you think of a Representative with 99% of its contributions from outside the district...
George II
Jan 2019
#53
To those cheering the Guardian article: What are you doing to support these candidates so they have
NBachers
Jan 2019
#27
It should be noted that the author of the article identifies as an anti-capitalist. Most of the
still_one
Jan 2019
#35
Exactly. It also ignores the most important question, where do they stand on the issues.
still_one
Jan 2019
#31
Even those who have income over $650,000 can't give more than $2,700 per year.
George II
Jan 2019
#49
Have any of those three candidates accepted any "dark money"? I see that in the 2014 cycle...
George II
Jan 2019
#67
The author of the piece is an anti-capitalist. Most of the Democratic party is not
still_one
Jan 2019
#43
The tricky part is that "Wall Street" could think that Democrats are good for the economy
Renew Deal
Jan 2019
#33
Post Removed is going to have a lot more posts as we get closer to the primaries.
Tobin S.
Jan 2019
#41
How they voted and where they stand on the issues. The debate on where ones political contributions
still_one
Jan 2019
#50
i think at this point i have come to realize there are a LOT WORSE things than appealing to...
samnsara
Jan 2019
#58
What does this article do to address the problem of money in politics? Absolutely nothing. Why...
beastie boy
Jan 2019
#60
The ever critical Obama bank regulations are no longer in place and the voting on that score is
BeckyDem
Jan 2019
#72
This crap is starting earlier than usual. The GOP/GOP donors must really know they are in trouble.
Freethinker65
Jan 2019
#80