Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

cilla4progress

(26,457 posts)

4. I disgree

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 11:42 PM

Sep 2017

Speech associated with historical violence or genocide perpetrated against a group, or that professes the same in the future, can be clearly delineated as not protected.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Hate Speech Is Not Free Speech By George Lakoff [View all] elleng Sep 2017 OP

Oh look, the literal goddamned word police. X_Digger Sep 2017 #1

And sometimes the answer is making an editorial decision unblock Sep 2017 #2

This isn't just wrong... it's ridiculously, dangerously wrong FBaggins Sep 2017 #3

I disgree cilla4progress Sep 2017 #4

Then the United States would be fundamentally altered. Are you British? Canadian? We in the US WinkyDink Sep 2017 #6

I think this is a legitimate interpretation of cilla4progress Sep 2017 #7

Quackery. And just who do you think would be defining "hate speech" right about now, huh? DJT? WinkyDink Sep 2017 #5