Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

sybylla

(8,655 posts)

14. It's not like this was going to pass without notice.

Reply to BradBlog (Original post)

Sun Nov 9, 2014, 10:00 PM

Nov 2014

This is why we have a vote canvass that takes place 7 days after the election. In the canvass, the ballot tallys, the voter registers and all the other secondary materials are reconciled and any errors as well as absentee ballots that arrive after election day are added in.

We are never going to have an error free election day. Shit happens. The question is whether or not we have in place a process that corrects for shit. And in Wisconsin we do.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WI Paper Ballot Scanners Failed to Count 1000s of Votes in 'Citizens United' Ballot Referendum [View all] BradBlog Nov 2014 OP

*insert rageface* sakabatou Nov 2014 #1

Shouldn't shit like this be enough to require a revote? SoapBox Nov 2014 #2

Why? Igel Nov 2014 #10

Seems like a very convenient "malfunction". cstanleytech Nov 2014 #3

lots of convenient problems in WI in the past couple of years bbgrunt Nov 2014 #4

Those scanners also jam frequently. postulater Nov 2014 #5

ELECTRONIC VOTING IS VOTE-RIGGING! Odin2005 Nov 2014 #6

"the...newspaper would be coming up with perfectly believable reasons"--THE PROBLEM ALL THE TIME HomerRamone Nov 2014 #7

Sounds like the guy that programs the "results" AleksS Nov 2014 #8

This is prob. just the tip of the iceberg. & I'm sick of peeps saying we voted for Walker & get what hue Nov 2014 #9

How many times must this happen before the billionaire media mentions it at all? nt valerief Nov 2014 #11

summary of the likely error - machines are only as good as the people who test them whereisjustice Nov 2014 #12

Living in Florida... CorporatistNation Nov 2014 #13

It's not like this was going to pass without notice. sybylla Nov 2014 #14

Are you kidding? BradBlog Nov 2014 #19

Oh I know you are all over this and constantly throw up the one exception the process sybylla Nov 2014 #26

"One exception"?! You mean "Cascade of Widespread Irregularities" as state Supreme Court Nom said? BradBlog Nov 2014 #29

Sad marions ghost Nov 2014 #23

As a Dem who has worked the polls on several election days. sybylla Nov 2014 #25

What re the "real threats" marions ghost Nov 2014 #27

Brad those machines didn't "fail to count the ballots" but were doing what they were ... Botany Nov 2014 #15

8 darkhorse wins, all GOP. Rex Nov 2014 #20

K&R! snot Nov 2014 #16

This is a perfect opportunity to put to rest the question of digital errors in voting machine tallies Half-Century Man Nov 2014 #17

Would be the right thing to do; a Hand count RobertEarl Nov 2014 #18

It amazes me, they can spend trillions of dollars on the NSA so they can see if each Rex Nov 2014 #21

^^^ marions ghost Nov 2014 #24

Rig The Vote blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #22

There are paper ballots. So count them already! n/t eridani Nov 2014 #28