Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Web host gives FCC a 28.8Kbps slow lane in net neutrality protest [View all]Recursion
(56,582 posts)54. I do not, nor do I think most people posting about it remotely understand it
What people are warning about, that is, the ability of carriers to slow down traffic they don't like carrying, is already completely legal, and would remain legal if anything short of common carrier were enacted (network neutrality is short of common carrier, and nobody wants to enact common carrier, because of for example spammers).
We've gotten where we are today by a deliberately vague and untested legal situation (net neutrality was never required by the FCC or IANA or anybody else, only vaguely agreed to by the various carriers), and it's usually always problematic when those finally get articulated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Excellent idea - I hope it spreads like wildfire including to the companies that are against this
newthinking
May 2014
#4
It is only small minded "fking idiots" when it is our side. The Owners are always correct. Ever
Vincardog
May 2014
#53
I dont support "FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's Internet "fast lane" proposal" do you? nm
rhett o rick
May 2014
#52