Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Federal agents raid marijuana dispensaries in Washington [View all]Billy Pilgrim
(96 posts)31. In this Rolling Stone interview he explains the crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries.
Interviewer:
"Let me ask you about the War on Drugs. You vowed in 2008, when you were running for election, that you would not "use Justice Department resources to try and circumvent state laws about medical marijuana." Yet we just ran a story that shows your administration is launching more raids on medical pot than the Bush administration did. What's up with that?"
Obama:
"Here's what's up: What I specifically said was that we were not going to prioritize prosecutions of persons who are using medical marijuana. I never made a commitment that somehow we were going to give carte blanche to large-scale producers and operators of marijuana and the reason is, because it's against federal law. I can't nullify congressional law. I can't ask the Justice Department to say, "Ignore completely a federal law that's on the books." What I can say is, "Use your prosecutorial discretion and properly prioritize your resources to go after things that are really doing folks damage." As a consequence, there haven't been prosecutions of users of marijuana for medical purposes.
The only tension that's come up and this gets hyped up a lot is a murky area where you have large-scale, commercial operations that may supply medical marijuana users, but in some cases may also be supplying recreational users. In that situation, we put the Justice Department in a very difficult place if we're telling them, "This is supposed to be against the law, but we want you to turn the other way." That's not something we're going to do. I do think it's important and useful to have a broader debate about our drug laws. One of the things we've done over the past three years was to make a sensible change when it came to the disparity in sentencing between crack cocaine and powder cocaine. We've had a discussion about how to focus on treatment, taking a public-health approach to drugs and lessening the overwhelming emphasis on criminal laws as a tool to deal with this issue. I think that's an appropriate debate that we should have."
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ready-for-the-fight-rolling-stone-interview-with-barack-obama-20120425
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In this Rolling Stone interview he explains the crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries.
Billy Pilgrim
Jul 2013
#31
The people who think you have to be sick to smoke pot are ruining it for everyone.
FiveGoodMen
Jul 2013
#117
Yes it is. Otherwise we would be seeing daily raids of big hedge funds and banks. nt
Mojorabbit
Jul 2013
#122
I hope you arent defending that bullshit. One of the most important powers of the executive branch
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#76
What makes you think he has the authority to order Justice to not enforce valid laws?
kristopher
Jul 2013
#20
But he could order the federal DoJ to stop enforcing it in states where it is explicitly
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#55
I just heard that Obama is going to give us all a job and help the middle class ....
MindMover
Jul 2013
#78
Prohibition ruined a lot of lives and we learned nothing from that gargantuan fuckup ....
MindMover
Jul 2013
#81
I really enjoy your writing and thoughts ...and hope that you are writing or speaking
MindMover
Jul 2013
#111
Yep, Obama is desperately trying to end the drug war but the dastardly TeaPubliKlans
TheKentuckian
Jul 2013
#124
In his 2008 campaign, President Obama VOWED he would not "use Justice Dept.resources to try
red dog 1
Jul 2013
#72
"I would not have the Justice Department prosecuting and raiding medical marijuana users.
red dog 1
Jul 2013
#119
Wow, how "reasonable" of them to suggest they won't explicitly look to bust grannies in wheelchairs
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2013
#77
coupled with his total disregard of Koch Bros dumping in Ark and now the Detroit River bank
wordpix
Jul 2013
#47
That's the latest bad name of the day. It all fits under the generic term "haters"
hobbit709
Jul 2013
#16
I actually thought this shit would end under the Obama presidency. Boy, was I ever wrong.
Throd
Jul 2013
#5
democracy and the will of the people mean nothing to the "feds" on this issue nt
msongs
Jul 2013
#19
When a law make the majority criminals, then it's the law that is criminal. n/t
nebenaube
Jul 2013
#112
Potheads. . .America's most dangerous criminals. They murder. . .twinkies! one box at a time.
Nanjing to Seoul
Jul 2013
#33
USA's war on drugs has a real purpose, especially regardin MJ - MIC priority
ConcernedCanuk
Jul 2013
#95
Obama would not have legal precedent to block the DEA from enforcing federal law.
Billy Pilgrim
Jul 2013
#34
really sucks. The state collects taxes, fees. Provides the Feds with easy list of names and address.
Sunlei
Jul 2013
#87
DEA to legalize MJ chemical for Big Pharma; keep it a crime for everyone else(2011).
Divernan
Jul 2013
#89