Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sop

(19,567 posts)
5. Trump's IRS agreement is against the Law, it will not stand.
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 02:03 PM
Tuesday

(From Tax Notes) 'Trump's IRS Audit Deal Denounced as Threat to Law and Code'

"The unprecedented order barring the pursuit of tax claims against President Trump and his affiliates undermines legal accountability and may violate the revenue code’s protections against political interference, according to observers."

"The May 19 order, signed by acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche following the dismissal of Trump v. IRS, No. 1:26-cv-20609 (S.D. Fla. 2026), also likely exceeds the scope of what the Justice Department may do, legal and policy professionals told Tax Notes."

“ 'There is no historical precedent for this kind of presidential immunity from the IRS,' Ajay K. Mehrotra of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law said. 'This is truly unheard of.' "

"Blanche signed the order as part of an addendum to the settlement agreement to end the lawsuit that Trump, his sons Donald Jr. and Eric, and the Trump Organization LLC, initiated January 29 seeking $10 billion in damages stemming from an unauthorized leak of their confidential tax information."
....
"The order permanently stops the United States from pursuing any claims arising from tax returns filed before the settlement’s effective date against Trump, his family members, affiliated individuals, trusts, and entities."
......
"In a May 21 letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Bisignano, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and member Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., called the agreement 'brazen corruption' and demanded answers on how it materialized, to what extent Trump was involved in its discussions, and whether Treasury General Counsel Brian Morrissey’s May 18 resignation was related to the agreement."
......
"Judge Kathleen M. Williams of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida noted in her order closing Trump v. IRS that the settlement agreement hadn’t been filed with the court."
.....
"Negotiations involving Trump to end tax audits of himself, his family, and his businesses could violate section 7217, which prohibits the president from directly or indirectly requesting the termination of a tax audit, Brandon DeBot of the Tax Law Center at New York University wrote in a blog post."
......
“ 'Trump’s dirty deal has crossed the line into illegality,' Robert Weissman and Lisa Gilbert of Public Citizen said in a statement, adding that the agreement may put IRS officers at risk of breaking the law."

More at link:

https://www.taxnotes.com/featured-news/trumps-irs-audit-deal-denounced-threat-law-and-code/2026/05/22/7w4v1

Recommendations

15 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

f**k that UpInArms Tuesday #1
FUCKED UP like a soup sandwich Give Peace A Chance Tuesday #8
So True 2na fisherman Tuesday #10
One big reason to vote blue in the midterms rurallib Tuesday #2
I don't think so..... Lovie777 Tuesday #3
yes, but that will take year of wasted tax money spent. Worth it yes. riversedge Tuesday #13
This shit is fucked up and bullshit in the extreme. Tactical Peek Tuesday #4
Banana Republic HighFired49 Tuesday #16
Trump's IRS agreement is against the Law, it will not stand. sop Tuesday #5
Who will stop it? Our judicial system appears to be completely broken. travelingthrulife Yesterday #20
I worry very much that we may be headed to an administration that will be bluestarone Tuesday #6
Since the judge has already paused the money to do her own investigation, Bayard Tuesday #7
THE AGREEMENT IS MEANINGLESS. MervinFerd Tuesday #9
Doesn't the language they used say "in perpetuity" or "forever" or something to that effect? That's what they were Karasu Tuesday #12
that was my first thought as well. nt Javaman Yesterday #17
No he won't. Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #11
NO!!! No immunity for this criminal bum! tonekat Tuesday #14
Any attorney involved in this should be disbarred. republianmushroom Tuesday #15
Is this maybe what they wanted all along? Alice B. Yesterday #18
You are probably spot on!! riversedge Yesterday #19
My dream is that we're inching closer to the freezing and seizing of assets. I'm gonna go light a candle. Alice B. Yesterday #23
I'm inclined to agree with you. 70sEraVet 42 min ago #27
"A land of laws". Another worn out myth. republianmushroom Yesterday #21
Tax immunity Mz Pip Yesterday #22
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent refuses to say whether Trump remains exempt from IRS audits Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 19 hrs ago #24
MS NOW- Even if Trump kills his $1.8 billion slush fund, his IRS lawsuit headache isn't over LetMyPeopleVote 54 min ago #25
Lacks consideration. Frasier Balzov 42 min ago #26
First off who are the US Officials?....................... Lovie777 40 min ago #28
Who has authority to convey audit immunity? No one. bucolic_frolic 40 min ago #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump to get audit immuni...»Reply #5