Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oswaldactedalone

(3,603 posts)
28. This is correct
Mon Dec 29, 2025, 11:30 PM
Dec 2025

5 years ago, I decided that at 5’10 and 199 lbs. it was time to get serious about weight loss. As a healthcare professional, I never felt right about not presenting a healthy appearance to patients and at one point in 2016 topped out at 220 with a 40” waist.

In addition to regular brisk walking several times a week, I began using time-restricted eating 3 days/wk. so that from roughly 5pm to 7am, I consumed water but no calories for 14 hours. At first, it was difficult and somewhat stressful to go that long without eating but I stuck with it and was surprised at how effective it was. I set a goal of losing 33lbs. in 33 weeks since there were 33 weeks left in the year when I began this, and met my goal of 166lbs. on the last day of the last week.

I continued using it 3x/wk. over the next three years and maintained all of my weight loss. I changed jobs 18 months ago with a change to more normal hours so increased time restricted eating to 6 days/wk. I’m now very happy at being right in the 158-162 range and use the time restriction to stay there. BTW, my metabolic test scores are all well within normal limits.

Just as important, your physiology greatly benefits from giving your body a break from constantly having to digest food and store excess calories. I highly recommend time restricted eating as a tool to lose and control weight as well as promoting overall wellness.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll stick with BMI thank you. 3 links in I can't find the definition underpants Dec 2025 #1
Here's the links to the BRI and BMI calculators. sinkingfeeling Dec 2025 #3
Okay. I stay at 220 for the BMI underpants Dec 2025 #8
Starts with demographics. sinkingfeeling Dec 2025 #15
Both of these say I'm fat. Kida sucks. n/t SpankMe Dec 2025 #25
Uh huh. Why do smell the whiff of big pharma around the edges? I love when they do this. It's not the first time Vinca Dec 2025 #2
Exactly. Maybe someday the focus can embrace lifestyle changes like nutrition, exercise and stress management. TheRickles Dec 2025 #6
The Trump admin is all about the new weight loss drugs. yardwork Dec 2025 #9
Has RFKjr seen Trump? NotHardly Dec 2025 #10
I can't explain it either. yardwork Dec 2025 #13
This has been known for years NickB79 Dec 2025 #11
What that weird drug does to people really creeps me out. ananda Dec 2025 #17
Some of the effects now being slightlv Dec 2025 #21
Insurance companies Old Crank Dec 2025 #35
Few of us meet the ever-changing standards, but here we are. Living and breathing. I'm about to turn 77. Vinca Dec 2025 #36
75 in March Old Crank Dec 2025 #38
(Warning: Ranty) Fat people being unhealthy is not universal any more than Bettie Dec 2025 #43
In ten years most of us will be on ozempic diets thought crime Dec 2025 #45
BMI is junk science angrychair Dec 2025 #4
I agree. Americanme Dec 2025 #12
sounds like you are doing great Skittles Dec 2025 #44
The correlation between obesity and health issues is unquestionable NickB79 Dec 2025 #14
i'm 6'2", 265 lbs and 14% body fat. According to BMI, I am obese. AZLD4Candidate Dec 2025 #24
And they're also at risk of many of the same health problems NickB79 Dec 2025 #41
Well, Just Change back to the old definition! raccoon Dec 2025 #5
Move More OC375 Dec 2025 #7
Move more and eat less FakeNoose Dec 2025 #23
So with such statistics the logical approach would be for the gov to have a plan to combat it. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #16
Arnold in his is prime would have been morbidly obese according to doc03 Dec 2025 #18
Stop the testing JoseBalow Dec 2025 #19
6'-5" @ 219 lbs coming from a loudmouth soon yonder Dec 2025 #20
BMI also isn't a very good health indicator for some ethnic groups fujiyamasan Dec 2025 #22
Bingo. Visceral fat is the killer. Belly fat. LiberalArkie Dec 2025 #32
so - you redefine 'obesity' to the point where it becomes an irrelevance - and people stopdiggin Dec 2025 #26
Too much unhealthy, processed food is marketed at us everywhere we turn. Diamond_Dog Dec 2025 #27
This is correct oswaldactedalone Dec 2025 #28
This makes sense gristy Dec 2025 #31
In a nutshell oswaldactedalone Dec 2025 #39
Who is going to tell Chump BidenRocks Dec 2025 #29
It just told me the old joke "One at a time on the scale". chouchou Dec 2025 #30
I'm not fat. I'm what they call a "bear". QueerDuck Dec 2025 #33
I'd be a stick figure if I followed the BRI debsy Dec 2025 #34
BMI / Height for obesity has its flaws. Old Crank Dec 2025 #37
I started intermittent fasting last May Tree Lady Dec 2025 #40
Anyone with a gut is going to be obese under BRI. maxsolomon Dec 2025 #42
The American diet doesn't help. Aussie105 Dec 2025 #46
Restrict diet soda, skim milk, seed oils, salt, processed food, fruit juice, fake meat GreatGazoo Jan 2026 #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»More than 75% of US adult...»Reply #28