Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FakeNoose

(41,772 posts)

18. The only benefit I can see from any of this is to the employers

Reply to Aussie105 (Reply #17)

Sun Dec 28, 2025, 10:24 AM

Dec 2025

They want to layoff their high-salaried people and use low-cost AI-bots that work 24/7/365 and don't demand any benefits. Best of all those bots do exactly as they're told and never talk back.

Except it wouldn't work that way. By laying everyone off, you've just killed the economy. Who will buy YOUR products or services, once everyone has lost their jobs and salaries? Who will pay taxes to keep the country going, while you skate the tax burden and accumulate wealth? It's all short-sighted and self-centered wet dreams....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An AI pioneer says the technology is 'limited' and won't replace humans anytime soon [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 OP

If it don't make pizza, it ain't worth nothing. /nt bucolic_frolic Dec 2025 #1

Might I add that you can only divide the pie of potential users so far. There is no way all of these data flashman13 Dec 2025 #2

In the end I think what you'll see is Amazo, Microsoft and Google be the dominant three. cstanleytech Dec 2025 #4

In the end the big guys will gobble up everyone else for pennies on the dollar. flashman13 Dec 2025 #5

Well I got agree there as when it comes to writing they are extremely limited. cstanleytech Dec 2025 #3

Yep. not fooled Dec 2025 #7

Even it's factual questions can be flawed so you should always verify as some Trump lawyers are learning right now. cstanleytech Dec 2025 #14

So don't use AI for writing. Anything you write with it isn't your work anyway and can't be copyrighted. highplainsdem Dec 2025 #11

I don't, I have tested it out though and it's just not at the point where it'll replace a human being. cstanleytech Dec 2025 #13

One serious limit: AI bots are completely incapable of actual logic William Seger Dec 2025 #6

While he's correct, it doesn't matter. Shipwack Dec 2025 #8

AI isn't really that much intelligence (for now at least), it is automation on steroids ToxMarz Dec 2025 #9

I heard the same thing from an industry insider mdbl Dec 2025 #10

The venture capital bubble may burst, but that's not going to stop the research. LudwigPastorius Dec 2025 #12

That article is nothing but pro-AI hype from someone incapable of being objective about AI. He's highplainsdem Dec 2025 #15

I totally agree. When the IT revolution rolled in during the late 60s, early 70s/80s, we were just seeing the beginning SWBTATTReg Dec 2025 #16

We already have examples of computer aided 'reality' presentations. Aussie105 Dec 2025 #17

The only benefit I can see from any of this is to the employers FakeNoose Dec 2025 #18

One setting of Ara does indeed talk back Polybius Dec 2025 #19

Company owners and bosses don't use that setting FakeNoose Dec 2025 #20

Yep, that's true Polybius Dec 2025 #21