Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(8,493 posts)
5. This is the important phrase
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 01:50 PM
Saturday

where it says DOJ :

"will redact any sensitive information from the files, such as the names of victims and other personal, identifying information. "

They will not only redact the names or information of victims but the perpetrators as well. The reason we know that is that they left the door open to a broad interpretation of "sensitive information" by saying "such as" which means that is only an example. Also they didn't say "names and other personal , identifying information of victims" they switched it around so that it applies to more than just victims.

I see the weasel words of Todd Blanche at work here. I also think if they get this ruling for their language they will use that as basis for how they treat all of the files and not just the grand jury transcripts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bondi files to release se...»Reply #5