Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(58,382 posts)
21. As a legal analyst explained, she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 12:19 AM
Nov 2025
All emergency applications are filed in the first instance with the “Circuit Justice” assigned to that particular court of appeals/geographic area. For the Boston-based First Circuit, that’s Justice Jackson. And with one equivocal exception, every “administrative” stay of which I’m aware has come from the Circuit Justice, not the full Court. Thus, the onus was on Justice Jackson to either enter the administrative stay herself, or risk being overruled by the full Court.
...
As for why Justice Jackson did it, to me, the clue is the last sentence. Had Jackson refused to issue an administrative stay, it’s entirely possible (indeed, she may already have known) that a majority of her colleagues were ready to do it themselves. I still think that this is what happened back in April when the full Court intervened shortly before 1 a.m., without explaining why Justice Alito hadn’t, in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemies Act case. And from Jackson’s perspective, an administrative stay from the full Court would’ve been worse—almost certainly because it would have been open-ended (that is, it would not have had a deadline). The upshot would’ve been that Judge McConnell’s order could’ve remained frozen indefinitely while the full Court took its time. Yesterday’s grant of a stay in Trump v. Orr, for instance, came 48 days after the Justice Department first sought emergency relief.

Instead, by keeping the case for herself and granting the same relief, in contrast, Justice Jackson was able to directly influence the timing in both the First Circuit and the Supreme Court, at least for now. She nudged the First Circuit (which I expect to rule by the end of the weekend, Monday at the latest); and, assuming that court rules against the Trump administration, she also tied her colleagues’ hands—by having her administrative stay expire 48 hours after the First Circuit rules. Of course, the full Court can extend the administrative stay (and Jackson can do it herself). But this way, at least, she’s putting pressure on everyone—the First Circuit and the full Court—to move very quickly in deciding whether or not Judge McConnell’s orders should be allowed to go into effect. From where I’m sitting, that’s why Justice Jackson, the most vocal critic among the justices of the Court’s behavior in Trump-related emergency applications, ruled herself here—rather than allowing the full Court to overrule her. It drastically increases the odds of the full Supreme Court resolving this issue by the end of next week—one way or the other.


https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DAMN! elleng Nov 2025 #1
The only rationale angrychair Nov 2025 #11
Would you prefer another unsigned shadow docket decision with no possibility of reversal? flashman13 Nov 2025 #16
Thanks. elleng Nov 2025 #23
Post removed Post removed Nov 2025 #24
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #19
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued the stay Polybius Nov 2025 #2
It was a strategic move Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #20
As a legal analyst explained, she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #21
Thanks elleng Nov 2025 #26
Thanks A Badger Nov 2025 #30
Fuck this SheltieLover Nov 2025 #3
It's a technicality, a procedural thing. valleyrogue Nov 2025 #4
Yet the starving will occur Bmoboy Nov 2025 #5
Fouled on a technicality? calimary Nov 2025 #29
F*ck procedure when it f*cks people NotHardly Nov 2025 #10
Right. elleng Nov 2025 #13
If the court can move quickly and not inflict harm on hungry families C_U_L8R Nov 2025 #6
Horrible Trueblue1968 Nov 2025 #7
42 million about to die of "temporary" denial of food NotHardly Nov 2025 #8
Fuck all the SCOTUS angrychair Nov 2025 #9
All? Polybius Nov 2025 #31
So much for "pro life". Screw every single one of these right wing assholes. BComplex Nov 2025 #12
So, someone please define "temporary" for me and "as quickly as possible". hamsterjill Nov 2025 #14
Here is a video that explains it a bit better Bev54 Nov 2025 #15
Thanks for this. hamsterjill Nov 2025 #17
So you are disappointed that she didn't deny the request which would have allowed Thomas to grant it onenote Nov 2025 #32
There are several newer threads that provide significantly more information and context Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #18
Correct. Jackson made the best of a bad situation. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #25
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #22
They just keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper for the mid-terms. C Moon Nov 2025 #27
MOTHERFUCKERS orangecrush Nov 2025 #28
SHAME ! republianmushroom Nov 2025 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows Trum...»Reply #21