Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

hamsterjill

(17,770 posts)

14. So, someone please define "temporary" for me and "as quickly as possible".

Reply to SunSeeker (Original post)

Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:53 PM

Nov 2025

Someone is being told not to starve over the weekend, right? I mean, if someone is already hungry tonight because they don't have any food, they are now expected to wait until at least Monday? Because the court won't be in session again until then???

This absolutely sucks. People starving in the richest nation on earth is a no brainer. Bring all of the justices to the court NOW and take care of this. Let the justices lose a little sleep. It might do them some good.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NotHardly

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court allows Trump administration to temporarily withhold some SNAP payments for November [View all] SunSeeker Nov 2025 OP

DAMN! elleng Nov 2025 #1

The only rationale angrychair Nov 2025 #11

Would you prefer another unsigned shadow docket decision with no possibility of reversal? flashman13 Nov 2025 #16

Thanks. elleng Nov 2025 #23

Post removed Post removed Nov 2025 #24

"" AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #19

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued the stay Polybius Nov 2025 #2

It was a strategic move Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #20

As a legal analyst explained, she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #21

Thanks elleng Nov 2025 #26

Thanks A Badger Nov 2025 #30

Fuck this SheltieLover Nov 2025 #3

It's a technicality, a procedural thing. valleyrogue Nov 2025 #4

Yet the starving will occur Bmoboy Nov 2025 #5

Fouled on a technicality? calimary Nov 2025 #29

F*ck procedure when it f*cks people NotHardly Nov 2025 #10

Right. elleng Nov 2025 #13

If the court can move quickly and not inflict harm on hungry families C_U_L8R Nov 2025 #6

Horrible Trueblue1968 Nov 2025 #7

42 million about to die of "temporary" denial of food NotHardly Nov 2025 #8

Fuck all the SCOTUS angrychair Nov 2025 #9

All? Polybius Nov 2025 #31

So much for "pro life". Screw every single one of these right wing assholes. BComplex Nov 2025 #12

So, someone please define "temporary" for me and "as quickly as possible". hamsterjill Nov 2025 #14

Here is a video that explains it a bit better Bev54 Nov 2025 #15

Thanks for this. hamsterjill Nov 2025 #17

So you are disappointed that she didn't deny the request which would have allowed Thomas to grant it onenote Nov 2025 #32

There are several newer threads that provide significantly more information and context Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #18

Correct. Jackson made the best of a bad situation. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #25

"" AllaN01Bear Nov 2025 #22

They just keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper for the mid-terms. C Moon Nov 2025 #27

MOTHERFUCKERS orangecrush Nov 2025 #28

SHAME ! republianmushroom Nov 2025 #33