Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

highplainsdem

(62,472 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 11:02 AM Nov 2025

FBI Tries to Unmask Owner of Infamous Archive.is Site [View all]

Source: 404 Media

The FBI is attempting to unmask the owner behind archive.today, a popular archiving site that is also regularly used to bypass paywalls on the internet and to avoid sending traffic to the original publishers of web content, according to a subpoena posted by the website. The FBI subpoena says it is part of a criminal investigation, though it does not provide any details about what alleged crime is being investigated. Archive.today is also popularly known by several of its mirrors, including archive.is and archive.ph.

The subpoena, which was posted on X by archive.today on October 30, was sent by the FBI to Tucows, a popular Canadian domain registrar. It demands that Tucows give the FBI the “customer or subscriber name, address of service, and billing address” and other information about the “customer behind archive.today.”

“THE INFORMATION SOUGHT THROUGH THIS SUBPOENA RELATES TO A FEDERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE FBI,” the subpoena says. “YOUR COMPANY IS REQUIRED TO FURNISH THIS INFORMATION. YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE OF THIS SUBPOENA INDEFINITELY AS ANY SUCH DISCLOSURE COULD INTERFERE WITH AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW.”

The subpoena also requests “Local and long distance telephone connection records (examples include: incoming and outgoing calls, push-to-talk, and SMS/MMS connection records); Means and source of payment (including any credit card or bank account number); Records of session times and duration for Internet connectivity; Telephone or Instrument number (including IMEI, IMSI, UFMI, and ESN) and/or other customer/subscriber number(s) used to identify customer/subscriber, including any temporarily assigned network address (including Internet Protocol addresses); Types of service used (e.g. push-to-talk, text, three-way calling, email services, cloud computing, gaming services, etc.)”

-snip-

Read more: https://www.404media.co/fbi-tries-to-unmask-owner-of-infamous-archive-is-site/



I doubt the Trump thugocracy is concerned about paywalls being evaded. They're almost certainly trying to ensure they can make data - including from government sites - and news they don't want people to know about disappear from the internet.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was my first thought. I hope that they'll fail in their attempts to sweep everything under the rug. Dave Bowman Nov 2025 #1
I can't think what the crime might be, and how are they going to enforce a subpoena Ocelot II Nov 2025 #2
When did the FBI have jurisdiction in Canada? Owens Nov 2025 #3
Maybe Trump told Patel that he'd successfully annexed Canada? Ocelot II Nov 2025 #4
putative international "cybercrime" against US victims. The Pirate Bay all over again. Eugene Nov 2025 #10
Aaron Swartz Clouds Passing Nov 2025 #5
May he rest in peace. 🙏 littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #21
Cue French Taunting From the Holy Grail N/T OneBlueDotS-Carolina Nov 2025 #6
a criminal attempt to rewrite history RainCaster Nov 2025 #7
many inconsistencies in the subpoena RainCaster Nov 2025 #8
It's a boilerplate subpoena form filled out by some lackey Ocelot II Nov 2025 #9
I posted this on HN IbogaProject Nov 2025 #11
Drudge Report links to the us.archive in their story links kimbutgar Nov 2025 #12
Just tell them all correspondence if via Signal greblach Nov 2025 #13
Why would a business in another country have to obey an FBI subpoena? Run it through the shredder. Vinca Nov 2025 #14
I'm not certain what the CRIMINAL charges might be... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #15
So you prefer misinformation to preservation of the truth? littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #22
What I prefer is that copyright protections be upheld... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #23
Not all archives are created equal. littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #24
I think that the authors of "the truth" should be responsible.... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #25
Hahaha! Nice try. littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #27
DU has a specific rule about respecting copyrights in the TOS because violations aren't a joke MichMan Nov 2025 #28
That is true. Have you ever alerted on those violations here? littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Nov 2025 #30
So... littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #31
I'm not posting any comments about the TOS other than what it states MichMan Nov 2025 #32
Neither am I. But I did respond to your reply and clarified the meaning of my original... littlemissmartypants Nov 2025 #33
They post the logo of the German BKA DFW Nov 2025 #16
If it is a Canadian domain, are they sending their subpoena to Canada? Bev54 Nov 2025 #17
Tucows is a Canadian company, but.... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #19
Tucows is a Canadian company, but.... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #18
Is there a Russian connection? From the 404 article... reACTIONary Nov 2025 #20
I happily use Archive.is every day ... TomWilm Nov 2025 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI Tries to Unmask Owner...