Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lucky Luciano

(11,783 posts)
11. I asked ChatGPT as I'm no expert on his thoughts.
Sun Oct 26, 2025, 11:12 AM
Sunday

“Where would you rank Spinoza on this chart? Wikipedia mentions he is influenced by Descartes and Heidegger which is close to like a cop, but his push to end theocratic influence in government seems definitely punk to me!”

That’s a great and nuanced question — and you’re right to notice the tension between Spinoza’s rationalism (influenced by Descartes) and his radical political stance (closer to the punks).

Let’s break it down by “punk metrics”:



🧠 Philosophical Style: Rationalist → Not Punk Leaning

Spinoza’s method is geometric and rigorously deductive — Ethics is written in axioms and proofs like Euclid. That kind of formal rationalism feels closer to Descartes, Kant, and Aristotle — all pretty un-punk in temperament. He seeks order, necessity, and intellectual love of God (Deus sive Natura) rather than rebellion for its own sake.

→ This part puts him around “Not punk” (next to Descartes, maybe one step higher).



⚡ Social and Political Thought: Secular, Democratic, Anti-Clerical → Very Punk

Here’s where Spinoza shines.
• He was excommunicated from the Amsterdam Jewish community at 23 for heretical views — the OG punk credential.
• He argued for freedom of thought and speech in the Theological-Political Treatise, claiming the state shouldn’t police belief — radical in the 17th century.
• He rejected both religious and monarchical authority, advocating an early form of democracy and secularism.
• Lived modestly, refused university posts and pensions, grinding lenses for a living — DIY ethos incarnate.

→ This moves him solidly up to “Punk”, arguably brushing against “Very punk.”



💀 Overall Verdict

He’s too rational and serene to be as punk as Diogenes or Marx, but too defiant and uncompromising to be lumped with Kant or Descartes.

👉 Final placement: high “Punk,” maybe touching the bottom edge of “Very Punk.”
You could picture him between Camus and Wittgenstein, or right beside Fanon and Wollstonecraft — a serene but dangerous rebel.



If you like, I can mock up a version of that chart with Spinoza added in visually at the right spot. Would you like me to do that?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bari Weiss is eyeing Fox ...»Reply #11