Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(162,186 posts)
20. What's different
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 07:57 AM
Wednesday

is that for some things, we contract out but NASA will "retain ownership" of the vehicles and/or software codes whereas in other cases, we will give "private" entities "grants" for producing the tech and in some cases, will "take ownership" (under NASA/the government) and in other cases, will just provide oversight, and the effort belongs to the private entity.

There had been an unfortunate trend in the modern U.S. where people were (righteously) complaining about "funding theoreticals, hypotheticals, and dreams" when you have large swaths of the population with no roof over their head or food to eat due to corporate malfeasance, and not correspondingly funding things to alleviate that. Thus the gradual "privatization" of space efforts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

just another chapter in the orange asshole vs empty husk grudge match. nt Javaman Tuesday #1
even a blind squirrel finds the occasional nut Eugene Tuesday #5
Imagine how much progress we could make on Earth by redirecting these billions here. Lonestarblue Tuesday #2
Unfortunately we have too many dreamers. The Grand Illuminist Tuesday #4
The SpaceX lunar plans are too complicated LastDemocratInSC Tuesday #3
More than fifty years ago sending people to the moon was a grand adventure... hunter Tuesday #6
I think it is supposed to be a reintroduction to off-world exploration BumRushDaShow Tuesday #7
Why would any rational human want to go to Mars? hunter Tuesday #8
You must not be a Trekkie like me! BumRushDaShow Tuesday #9
I've been a Star Trek fan since the first episode aired and a Science Fiction fan longer than that. hunter Tuesday #12
Well then you would know the "reason" BumRushDaShow Tuesday #15
Baby smiles. hunter Tuesday #16
That was the ongoing debate within Trek BumRushDaShow Tuesday #18
Species survival RoseTrellis Tuesday #13
If we survive for any great time as a species (most species don't) it won't be because we built rockets. hunter Tuesday #17
Here is a novel idea angrychair Tuesday #10
NASA still contracted that out BumRushDaShow Tuesday #11
Not like it used to be angrychair Tuesday #19
What's different BumRushDaShow Wednesday #20
I get that angrychair Wednesday #21
We have a lack of effective oversight BumRushDaShow Wednesday #22
Absolutely agree angrychair Wednesday #23
Musk's Starship Lander has never looked like a good idea. LudwigPastorius Tuesday #14
Nothing that asshole does angrychair Wednesday #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NASA opens SpaceX's moon ...»Reply #20