Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SARose

(1,769 posts)

15. And why should the judiciary continue to give "deference"

Reply to hadEnuf (Reply #14)

Mon Oct 20, 2025, 11:32 PM

Monday

to Trump? I don’t get it.

The man is a well documented liar; a 34 times convicted felon; a convicted sexual predator; and a coup plotting piece of garbage.

To me, this is absolute corruption in plain sight. Sick.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals court lets Trump deploy Oregon National Guard to Portland [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

The Nazis are embedded everywhere these days. Blues Heron Monday #1

Oregon should refuse angrychair Monday #2

Yes, there needs to be an immediate appeal to the full 9th Circuit. 2 Trump appointees made this ruling. SunSeeker Monday #5

They should give them refresher training on what is an isn't illegal order. nilram Monday #3

2-1 decision, 2 Trump appointees sided with Trump. SunSeeker Monday #4

I'm sure the full 9th circuit will overturn this ruling Fiendish Thingy Monday #6

I don't think they'll take it FBaggins Monday #10

But did they issue a stay pending appeal? Fiendish Thingy Monday #13

More info from USA Today and Democracy Docket SARose Monday #7

How can we still have faith in the legal system? BlueKota Monday #8

There may be an en banc rehearing of this ruling LetMyPeopleVote Monday #9

Awesome! SARose Monday #16

Here's a vexing legal question: hadEnuf Monday #11

That's isn't really a legal question FBaggins Monday #12

I guess I should have indicated sarcasm. hadEnuf Monday #14

And why should the judiciary continue to give "deference" SARose Monday #15

It's awful. hadEnuf Tuesday #17