Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(57,017 posts)

4. 2-1 decision, 2 Trump appointees sided with Trump.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Oct 20, 2025, 04:23 PM

Monday

Although the 7th Circuit gave “substantial deference” to the commander in chief’s views, it found no credible evidence to support his claim that widespread violence currently plagues Chicago. The 9th Circuit panel was given even less evidence for Portland. It was an absolutely baseless decision by two Trumper judges.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SARose not fooled Cognitive_Resonance

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals court lets Trump deploy Oregon National Guard to Portland [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

The Nazis are embedded everywhere these days. Blues Heron Monday #1

Oregon should refuse angrychair Monday #2

Yes, there needs to be an immediate appeal to the full 9th Circuit. 2 Trump appointees made this ruling. SunSeeker Monday #5

They should give them refresher training on what is an isn't illegal order. nilram Monday #3

2-1 decision, 2 Trump appointees sided with Trump. SunSeeker Monday #4

I'm sure the full 9th circuit will overturn this ruling Fiendish Thingy Monday #6

I don't think they'll take it FBaggins Monday #10

But did they issue a stay pending appeal? Fiendish Thingy Monday #13

More info from USA Today and Democracy Docket SARose Monday #7

How can we still have faith in the legal system? BlueKota Monday #8

There may be an en banc rehearing of this ruling LetMyPeopleVote Monday #9

Awesome! SARose Monday #16

Here's a vexing legal question: hadEnuf Monday #11

That's isn't really a legal question FBaggins Monday #12

I guess I should have indicated sarcasm. hadEnuf Monday #14

And why should the judiciary continue to give "deference" SARose Monday #15

It's awful. hadEnuf Tuesday #17

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court lets Trump ...»Reply #4