Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

angrychair

(11,322 posts)

2. Oregon should refuse

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Oct 20, 2025, 03:48 PM

Monday

Appeal to the while 9th circuit court or just say "No one is available" quiet quiting

In all seriousness, the courts are garbage can of inconsistencies.

There is zero evidence for a need to deploy federalized national guard anywhere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

stollen moniss SunSeeker Bakerboy17 IbogaProject

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals court lets Trump deploy Oregon National Guard to Portland [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

The Nazis are embedded everywhere these days. Blues Heron Monday #1

Oregon should refuse angrychair Monday #2

Yes, there needs to be an immediate appeal to the full 9th Circuit. 2 Trump appointees made this ruling. SunSeeker Monday #5

They should give them refresher training on what is an isn't illegal order. nilram Monday #3

2-1 decision, 2 Trump appointees sided with Trump. SunSeeker Monday #4

I'm sure the full 9th circuit will overturn this ruling Fiendish Thingy Monday #6

I don't think they'll take it FBaggins Monday #10

But did they issue a stay pending appeal? Fiendish Thingy Monday #13

More info from USA Today and Democracy Docket SARose Monday #7

How can we still have faith in the legal system? BlueKota Monday #8

There may be an en banc rehearing of this ruling LetMyPeopleVote Monday #9

Awesome! SARose Monday #16

Here's a vexing legal question: hadEnuf Monday #11

That's isn't really a legal question FBaggins Monday #12

I guess I should have indicated sarcasm. hadEnuf Monday #14

And why should the judiciary continue to give "deference" SARose Monday #15

It's awful. hadEnuf Tuesday #17