Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

bluestarone

(20,595 posts)

27. Yep, especially if you only use them hunting

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Reply #4)

Mon Oct 20, 2025, 12:28 PM

Oct 20

Democrats.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court will consider whether people who regularly smoke pot can legally own guns [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 20 OP

First the need to define "regularly" DemMedic Oct 20 #1

Widespread enforcement of this law could turn markodochartaigh Oct 20 #2

How About Beer? (NT) Daigan Oct 20 #3

Good point. NH Ethylene Oct 20 #5

Kavanaugh would have to recuse himself. Harker Oct 20 #19

You beat me to it PatSeg Oct 20 #23

Is it a "controlled substance"? maxsolomon Oct 20 #26

But you can be an alcoholic and own as many guns no_hypocrisy Oct 20 #4

Yeah, they can require that a breathalizer car-starter be installed 70sEraVet Oct 20 #21

Yep, especially if you only use them hunting bluestarone Oct 20 #27

They can't wrap their minds around how mild weed really is compared to nearly all other drugs even aspirin Blues Heron Oct 20 #6

It was a combination of evil business goals and racism IbogaProject Oct 20 #22

People who smoke pot need more rights, not fewer. NH Ethylene Oct 20 #7

A drunk with a gun is much more dangerous than a stoner with a gun ashredux Oct 20 #8

Like many other things Republican... luv2fly Oct 20 #10

About a year or so ago BumRushDaShow Oct 20 #13

Anyone who grew up in the midwestern states ... farm country ... FakeNoose Oct 20 #31

I remember back when I was a Girl Scout BumRushDaShow Oct 20 #33

Reefer Madness twodogsbarking Oct 20 #9

So there IS a limit to 2A rights Ursus Rex Oct 20 #11

Right? Unwind Your Mind Oct 20 #15

Exactly what I was thinking... especially considering the number of domestic violence victims who have been... Alice B. Oct 20 #16

Limitations are for other people. Harker Oct 20 #20

So glad the "Supreme" (not so supreme) Court has nothing better to do than this. llmart Oct 20 #12

People who eat beef jerky should be investigated to see if they can legally own guns twodogsbarking Oct 20 #14

I think maybe you should smoke some pot to make an informed decision. twodogsbarking Oct 20 #17

Alcohol? get the red out Oct 20 #18

Now do mentally insane MAGA fans. Initech Oct 20 #24

ATF Form 4473 Question F. maxsolomon Oct 20 #25

The scorecard... Moostache Oct 20 #28

Seriously! Deep State Witch Oct 20 #32

A lot of right-wing assholes here in Florida have rzemanfl Oct 20 #29

They all lied on their ATF forms maxsolomon Oct 20 #35

These people were all old folks like me. rzemanfl Oct 20 #36

They have to fill them out every time they buy a new Precious. maxsolomon Oct 20 #37

Really? I bought guns in the '70s & '80s (shotguns) and don't recall any paperwork. rzemanfl Oct 20 #38

I don't know the minutiae of the form's history. maxsolomon Oct 20 #39

This article says the marijuana language was added in 2016 in response to state legalizations- rzemanfl Oct 20 #40

I would presume it's the language in bold below that was added in 2016. maxsolomon Oct 20 #43

Yes, the bold part. rzemanfl Oct 20 #44

Libertarians? Deep State Witch Oct 20 #30

My thought has always been kkmarie Oct 20 #34

is someone afraid they'll mistake the gun for a bong? mdbl Oct 20 #41

Republicans J_William_Ryan Oct 20 #42

Hold on angrychair Oct 20 #45