Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lonely bird

(2,459 posts)
13. Oh, no problem. You are correct.
Thu Jul 17, 2025, 05:30 PM
Jul 17

I just had discovered the basic idea that the SCOTUS put forth while trying claim it was to be read very narrowly as though the RWRNJs would adhere to that. The website designer case was completely hypothetical, iirc.

Interesting Wikipedia link…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are so good at drumming up fear/fake outrage over things that aren't happening. emulatorloo Jul 17 #1
Agree in general SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #2
Except lonely bird Jul 17 #3
Not quite the same circumstances SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #4
To be clear, it was a little more complicated than that Polybius Jul 17 #8
Fair enough, thank you! n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #9
Interesting... lonely bird Jul 17 #10
OK SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #12
Oh, no problem. You are correct. lonely bird Jul 17 #13
Yes, supposed to be very narrow n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #14
"The theory is not a fixture of K-12 education" emulatorloo Jul 17 #5
I agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Jul 17 #6
It's the camel's nose under the tent. cbabe Jul 17 #7
Why? lonely bird Jul 17 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arkansas can enforce crit...»Reply #13