Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(104,099 posts)
6. No "maybe" about it; they've said they are moving in the opposite direction from before
Thu Jul 10, 2025, 12:44 PM
Thursday
DOJ Leader Calls for Civil Rights ‘Paradigm Shift’ After Exodus

Harmeet Dhillon says civil rights division moving in ‘opposite direction’
Hundreds of career lawyers resigned, reassigned

Dhillon, a San Francisco lawyer who previously represented Trump in his personal capacity, is known for arguing conservative positions in cases involving religious liberty, treatment for transgender minors, and censorship on college campuses

She has overseen a stark realignment of division priorities, moving to focus its resources toward conservative issues, including anti-Christian bias and gun rights. Established in 1957 during the civil rights movement, the division has historically enforced anti-discrimination laws in voting, education, housing, and other areas.
...
Closing out the conservative legal association’s all-day conference on executive branch review, Dhillon called for a “paradigm shift” at the unit and described a “generational opportunity for a reformation within civil rights.”

She outlined her priorities for the division as fighting against racial quotas, blocking transgender women from participating in women’s sports teams, and protecting Jewish students on college campuses, among other missions, which align with new mission statements that were recently sent to the division’s sections.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/doj-leader-calls-for-civil-rights-paradigm-shift-after-exodus

Trump ally pushes DoJ unit to shift civil rights focus, new messages show

The justice department’s civil rights division is shifting its focus away from its longstanding work protecting the rights of marginalized groups and will instead pivot towards Donald Trump’s priorities including hunting for noncitizen voters and protecting white people from discrimination, according to new internal mission statements seen by the Guardian.

The new priorities were sent to several sections of the civil rights division this week by Harmeet Dhillon, a Trump ally who was confirmed a little more than two weeks ago to lead the division. Several of them give only glancing mention to the statutes and kinds of discrimination that have long been the focus of the division, which dates back to the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Several of the mission statements point to Trump’s executive orders as priorities for the section.

The mission statement for the voting section, for example, barely mentions the Voting Rights Act and instead says the section will focus on preventing voter fraud – which is exceedingly rare – and helping states find noncitizens on their voter rolls (noncitizen voting is also exceedingly rare). The guidance for the Housing and Civil Enforcement section does not make a single mention of the Fair Housing Act, the landmark 1968 civil rights law that has long been a central part of the department’s work.

“It’s absolutely astonishing,” said Sasha Samberg-Champion, a former appellate lawyer in the justice department’s civil rights division. “This reflects the complete abdication of the core responsibilities of each of these sections.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/justice-department-civil-rights-division-trump

Noncitizen voting will of course, be punished by banishment, if suspected (and I wouldn't be surprised if they try that on actual citizens with similar names to noncitizens - searches of voter rolls by "voter fraud" obsessives are typically mostly about mistaken identity).

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Reeks of voter suppressi...»Reply #6