Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Hey Joe

(6 posts)

2. Exactly

Reply to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat May 17, 2025, 10:22 AM

Yesterday

The significant harm would most likely mean disclosure of some kind of criminal action or malfeasance committed by this administration.
These people lie like they breathe.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

wolfie001 WizGlick Fla Dem yliza Bernardo de La Paz Wonder Why AltairIV 2naSalit Attilatheblond OMGWTF the nelm buzzycrumbhunger SADAR

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In unsealed declaration, Rubio claims disclosing some information about Abrego Garcia case would cause 'significant harm [View all] groundloop Yesterday OP

What "significant harm" might that be? Ocelot II Yesterday #1

Exactly Hey Joe Yesterday #2

Truckload of manure wolfie001 Yesterday #3

When did you ever care about our national security interests, Weasel? Clouds Passing Yesterday #4

Everyone knows what the significant harm would be. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #5

Significant harm....to the Trump administration. Doodley Yesterday #6

Significant harm? usonian Yesterday #7

We the People will never know thanks to a truly rogue judge Evolve Dammit Yesterday #25

Oops! Too late little Marco JustAnotherGen Yesterday #8

In other words. Mblaze Yesterday #9

Rubio is a dick. Gimpyknee Yesterday #10

I call bullshit Wild blueberry Yesterday #11

Big ears Marco MaineNative Yesterday #12

Never confess. No matter how guilty. Shameless. Marcuse Yesterday #13

The "significant harm" is just more ketchup on the walls. We can't offend The Boy King Midnight Writer Yesterday #14

Lies Iamscrewed Yesterday #15

Only thing to trust is their incompetence bmichaelh Yesterday #16

If they had a VALID REASON for not obeying the Supreme Court ruling Martin Eden Yesterday #17

Cause significant harm to U.S. foreign relations and national security interests? Grins Yesterday #18

They still have to disclose it to the judge Nictuku Yesterday #19

That statement and supporting evidence angrychair Yesterday #20

Lying liars always lie Picaro Yesterday #21

I bet it would, for this administration. Joinfortmill Yesterday #22

BS nwduke Yesterday #23

Significant harm in the form of we ignored your silly ass laws.... Whoopsie Evolve Dammit Yesterday #24

What shithole musk Republicans have done to Garcia and his family........... Lovie777 Yesterday #26

Did he Traildogbob Yesterday #27

Yes, it would expose to the whole world the Trump Adminstration's lies about Abrego Garcia. Jim__ Yesterday #28

I used to think Lindsey Graham was the most unprincipled, two-faced, lying ass-kisser in the Republican party. sop Yesterday #29

Yeah, the old "we can't tell you because it would endanger national security" scam. That's wearing pretty thin Martin68 19 hrs ago #30

Cause significant harm to the Drumpf misadministration. Fixed it for you. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 3 hrs ago #31