Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowdogintexas

(23,483 posts)
12. There is pressure here for hand counting too. That is fine in a county with 5000 voters
Sun Jun 2, 2024, 01:49 PM
Jun 2024

but we have counties with more than 1 million voters. A couple of the smaller counties did hand counts and came up with lots of errors. This does not bode well.

Our Presidential and Gubernatorial ballots are quite long, mostly because we have a ton of county wide judicial contests along with the various district and state wide votes. I shudder at the thought of hand counting!!

The MAGAs on our County Commissioner's Court are pushing hard for hand counting; they want them hand counted at the precinct before sending to the Elections Office. Because we are paid for hours worked at the precinct (up to 14 hours) it will increase costs; we would need a second shift of vote counters after the opening shift has worked 14 hours. That is a huge cost increase.

We have already lost the battle to use totally blank ballots; now we are supposed to 'track' ballots by a serial number on the ballot (another increased cost).When we had handmarked ballots, the serial numbers were printed on the ballots, and we always had thousands of unused ballots. Totally blank ballots may be used indefinitely, so no trashing needed. I have worked elections where we were issued 800 pre printed ballots and only used 200.


Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a very dumb move LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #1
It should take five minutes to count them. jimfields33 Jun 2024 #7
Fewer than the combined fingers and toes of the 3 election officials. Wonder Why Jun 2024 #20
No, no, no. That's North Dakota. Angleae Jun 2024 #43
Paranoid................................. Lovie777 Jun 2024 #2
I realize they are much smaller counties than mine, but some of our ballots are three pages long! CrispyQ Jun 2024 #3
Yeah...Helen and George from the liquor store.. ret5hd Jun 2024 #4
LOL. That would make a great movie segment. 🎥 -nt CrispyQ Jun 2024 #8
Helen: ret5hd Jun 2024 #11
Won't say anything, I'm too nice to our farmers and ranchers out there in the Dakotas. Being that things probably SWBTATTReg Jun 2024 #5
It is more work for the election workers. mysteryowl Jun 2024 #6
Dare I say it? "Hand job?" mpcamb Jun 2024 #50
Their elections, their call. Igel Jun 2024 #9
Who decides WHO the counters are? bluestarone Jun 2024 #10
There is pressure here for hand counting too. That is fine in a county with 5000 voters yellowdogintexas Jun 2024 #12
Here in Philly BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #13
that requirement to wait for Election Day to start with the mail-ins just blew me away yellowdogintexas Jun 2024 #37
It's done on purpose BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #39
They have not thought this through AverageOldGuy Jun 2024 #14
If the precincts are small enough, hand counting is no problem questionseverything Jun 2024 #15
Idiots. ...nt 2naSalit Jun 2024 #16
The stupidity is remarkable. SarahD Jun 2024 #17
I spent a lot of my life in manufacturing. Scruffy1 Jun 2024 #18
This could be a very good thing LiberalLovinLug Jun 2024 #19
"I don't get why a larger country can't do this too." BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #23
Break it down into precincts small enough to count overnight. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2024 #25
Part of the issue here is the long day leftieNanner Jun 2024 #26
Counters and poll workers do not have to be the same people. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2024 #28
In 2020, Philly had 1703 "Divisions" which are the same as "precincts" BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #30
Just a lot of excuses. LiberalLovinLug Jun 2024 #32
"Many other western democracies in Europe have even more population density." BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #34
density not total LiberalLovinLug Jun 2024 #36
"Density" is irrelevant BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #38
Another big difference BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #40
Yes, the amount of boxes to check is a big difference. LiberalLovinLug Jun 2024 #41
To address BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #42
Images of the Flori-Duh recount and hanging chads come to mind. 4lbs Jun 2024 #21
Actually if the entire state of Florida had been hand counted questionseverything Jun 2024 #31
Yeah, a MAGA county in AZ did a experiment with hand counting SpankMe Jun 2024 #22
Might need six people to count each ballot. Old Crank Jun 2024 #24
Gosh well all be in the edge of our seats awaiting the results. underpants Jun 2024 #27
STATES run elections. Can a COUNTY do this on its own? Grins Jun 2024 #29
If the state allows it. Actually counties "run" and administer elections LeftInTX Jun 2024 #35
Call me paranoid, but I also worry about machines being rigged. NH Ethylene Jun 2024 #33
Before criticizing South Dakota... brooklynite Jun 2024 #44
The "Help America Vote Act" required that machines have a "paper trail" BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #46
Yes, but I wasn't demanding hand counting. brooklynite Jun 2024 #47
How a state does their audit process BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #48
How does pointing out how machines can be manipulated help your no-hand-counting argument? LiberalLovinLug Jun 2024 #54
Here we go BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #55
Actually judge rawl did make that claim about the paperless machines questionseverything Jun 2024 #51
They should do a public demonstration of hand counting. LiberalFighter Jun 2024 #45
Here is your example BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #49
My experience in just managing ballots ga_girl Jun 2024 #52
Think anyone would ever throw out votes they don't like? dlk Jun 2024 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In a rare step, 3 South D...»Reply #12