Supreme Court won't fast-track ruling on Trump's claim of immunity

[EndlessWire]

71. There are so many cases and appeals

I'm getting really mixed up.

So, this is Jack's request to fast track the immunity claim? This immunity claim underlies all of Trump's defenses in all of the cases and indictments.

So the recent Colorado Supreme Court decision that Trump participated in an insurrection, thereby disqualifying him from the ballot, is separate from Jack's action. But, do they blend together because Trump claims that he had the right as King, er, President to say what he wanted, do whatever he wanted?

So, Jack had two opportunities to fast track this immunity defense? And SCOTUS just shot down his second request without comment? I think that it may very well be that they could decline to even take the case, or may be waiting for Trump's inevitable appeal to them when he loses Jack's first response. I dunno, I need to redo my spreadsheet, I am starting to lose clarity.

Also, EJ Carroll's case is coming up on January 16th, I believe, and also he is claiming immunity in that case, too. WTF? Doesn't SCOTUS believe in justice anywhere? Because, when that case arrives at a verdict, Trump will file an appeal for that decision, as well. He doesn't care how many times judges have told him "no."

Trump doesn't have immunity from crime, period. From sexual assault to insurrection to stealing classified documents, he is expecting the Supremes to declare him exempt, that he is above the law. The USSC better step up. This is not hard! If they need months to figure it out, there is really something wrong. The naked light of day will expose them and what their bribe money bought us.