Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home [View all]Marthe48
(21,961 posts)12. I think NY should defy
this decision by republican activist >gag< judges, 3 of whom were seated illegally, and 1 of whom is compromised beyond belief.
The court has decided that any American in any state can carry a gun, because they liberally interpreted the 2A. OTOH, they are narrowly interpreting Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness to ban abortions. It is schizophrenic, to say the least. Why do the states have to abide by rulings made by insane and illegitimate people who don't deserve to wear those robes, much less decide on American laws? F**k them, and the criminals who put them on that bench. Get the wrongly seated and compromised people off the bench, or expand the court. It is past ridiculous to take the clown show seriously.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
OP
I expect the Court is going to pull a lot of bad decisions out of their ass this session. n/t
malthaussen
Jun 2022
#9
The biggest quirk in NY law was the NYC required an approved license for the city
Historic NY
Jun 2022
#10
Biden would never be so irresponsible as to sanction the concept of "Screw the Supreme Court"
Midwestern Democrat
Jun 2022
#63
While a Democratic House passes a bill to increase SC's personal security
BeyondGeography
Jun 2022
#16
All I know is, I don't want to hear these assholes screaming that the govt. wants their damn guns.
AngryOldDem
Jun 2022
#21
Honestly I think we should strike Marbury v. Madison down by EO and see what they try to do about it
bucolic_frolic
Jun 2022
#23
I'm confused. When it serves the whackadoodles desires the SCOTUS sides with "states rights" - when
NoMoreRepugs
Jun 2022
#52
Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in Bruen is a perfect example of what I call a "pivotal concurrence"
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
#57
A question i've ALWAYS had here is the courts are full steam ahead for gun freedoms, BUT
bluestarone
Jun 2022
#61