Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New emails emerge of oval office confrontation three days before Jan. 6 [View all]riversedge
(78,238 posts)Clark is a nervy, stupid, man. Period.
https://wapo.st/3zECT6M
...................After the New York Times reported in January 2021 about Clarks actions, he said he engaged in a candid discussion of options and pros and cons with the president, denied that he had a plan to oust Rosen, and criticized others in the meeting for talking publicly and distorting the discussion.
Now, however, key witnesses have provided Congress with a fuller account of Clarks actions, including new details about the confrontation that took place in the Jan. 3 Oval Office meeting, which lasted nearly three hours.
A reconstruction of the events by The Washington Post, based on the court filings, depositions, Senate and House reports, previously undisclosed emails, and interviews with knowledgeable government officials, shows how close the country came to crisis three days before the insurrection.
The evidence, which fills in crucial details about Clarks efforts, includes an email showing he was sent a draft of a letter outlining a plan to try to overturn the election by a just-arrived Justice Department official who had once written a book claiming President Barack Obama planned to subvert the Constitution.......................
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):