Latest Breaking News

Bernardo de La Paz

(59,546 posts)

42. Yes the headline stinks and some people here have run with it without reading. . . . nt

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #34)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 10:46 AM

Jan 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge throws out Biden administration's massive Gulf of Mexico oil and gas lease sale [View all] former9thward Jan 2022 OP

Rather confusing until you read the link This is a good thing, a win for Biden... Enter stage left Jan 2022 #1

Exactly. I just posted a quickie explanation below in post #2 BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #3

Yup. Biden was forced to follow through on some tRump garbage, but now is free of it. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #27

Was just about to post - this is actually a "win" for the Biden administration BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #2

Thank you for this post. Enter stage left Jan 2022 #4

You are welcome BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #5

this was easier for me to understand... but it' s still confusing to me nt orleans Jan 2022 #20

It's confusing because there are all kinds of politics involved in how this played out BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #22

WaPo article is very clear, to me. Issue is complicated. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #29

Yes - I got that (posted a number of times in the thread) BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #34

Yes the headline stinks and some people here have run with it without reading. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #42

I don't think so. former9thward Jan 2022 #6

Did you read the article that you posted or were just going for the headline? BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #8

Nobody forced them. former9thward Jan 2022 #12

They DID appeal it BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #15

Why did they go ahead with the sale? former9thward Jan 2022 #16

See this BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #18

Easier to go along with the sale and focus the energy on appealing the case altogether. cstanleytech Jan 2022 #25

They WERE forced. They DID appeal. They lost the appeal. Enviros won a NEW case. WaPo says! Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #28

Think again. Courts ORDERED sale to go ahead Nov 2021. WaPo article Jan 27, 2022. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #30

The headline/story seemed counter-intuitive in context with Biden's goals on climate change agenda msfiddlestix Jan 2022 #7

The Biden administration wanted the sale of the leases to go through. former9thward Jan 2022 #10

No. A court ORDERED him to do it. BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #11

Why didn't they appeal? former9thward Jan 2022 #13

Further comment which I knew to be the case. former9thward Jan 2022 #14

See this post BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #17

People (environmentalists) can SAY all they want in June. By August it was clear sale HAD to occur Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #31

Ok, So now I am confused then. msfiddlestix Jan 2022 #36

So it will be appealed madville Jan 2022 #9

This is the 68 page decision for any interested. former9thward Jan 2022 #19

Did you read it? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #32

The case was on appeal. former9thward Jan 2022 #37

NO. They could not wait. You don't know what an injunction is. Read the rulings. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #40

Trump was / is such a fucker__________n/t TeamProg Jan 2022 #21

Here's the AP version of the story. Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #23

It says the same as the Post. former9thward Jan 2022 #39

I think it states it more clearly than the story in the OP. Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #44

I just skimmed Karma13612 Jan 2022 #24

As much as some may like to throw shade on Bezos, this is on the WP, not Bezo. He does not JohnSJ Jan 2022 #35

+1 for injecting reality. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #41

Very true Karma13612 Jan 2022 #47

Good to know. But in that case, Karma13612 Jan 2022 #45

Agreed JohnSJ Jan 2022 #46

WORST HEADLINE EVER NurseJackie Jan 2022 #26

The contentious responses to this post exemplify the distance we must cross. jaxexpat Jan 2022 #33

I would say many people on the internet are confused -- not the Post. former9thward Jan 2022 #38

This was what the judge who put the injunction in place wrote in his 44 page June 2021 ruling BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #43