Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
15. There are more nuances to this move.
Tue Sep 7, 2021, 01:14 PM
Sep 2021

The most important of them is that the conflict in the Middle East has turned from Arab-Israeli to Shiah-Sunni, with Israel being the tie-breaker power player who is currently acting in support of Sunni coalition of powers against Iran, who are predominantly Shiah. A nuclear Iran is as much a danger to Israel as it is to Saudi Arabia, or Turkey or Egypt, or Jordan. It's not just the US that supports Israel's opposition to Iran, but much of the Middle East.

The second one is that prioritizing diplomacy does not preclude military threats. In prioritizing diplomacy, it is very advantageous for the US to outsource all the military threats to Israel and play the "good cop" with diplomatic moves and covertly coordinating with Israel on the military front. It is also advantageous for any Middle Eastern Sunni state to leave the threat making to Israel, since none of them can legitimately threaten Iran militarily.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Israel's military chief s...»Reply #15