Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(161,456 posts)
47. It's $10,000 for each subsquent offense after the 1st
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 01:49 PM
Feb 2021
Engrossed in House (02/02/2021)


H. Res. 73



In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 2, 2021.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. Imposition of fines for failure to complete security screening for entrance to House chamber.

(a) Imposition by Sergeant-at-Arms.— (1) The Sergeant-at-Arms is authorized and directed to impose a fine against a Member, Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner for failure to complete security screening for entrance to the House Chamber.

(2) A fine imposed pursuant to this resolution shall be $5,000 for a first offense and $10,000 for any subsequent offense.

(3) The Sergeant-at-Arms shall promptly notify in writing the Member, Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner, the Speaker, the Committee on Ethics, and the Chief Administrative Officer of any fine under this subsection. Such notification shall include findings detailing the violation and shall also be made publicly available by the chair of the Committee on Ethics.

(b) Appeal to Committee on Ethics.— (1) The Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may appeal the fine imposed under subsection (a) in writing to the Committee on Ethics not later than 30 calendar days or five legislative days, whichever is later, after notification pursuant to subsection (a)(3). Such appeal shall include a response to the findings issued by the Sergeant-at-Arms pursuant to such paragraph.

(2) Upon receipt of an appeal pursuant to paragraph (1), the Committee on Ethics shall have a period of 30 calendar days or five legislative days, whichever is later, to consider the appeal. The fine will be upheld unless the appeal is agreed to by a majority of the Committee. Upon a determination regarding the appeal or if no appeal has been filed at the expiration of the period specified in paragraph (1), the chair of the Committee on Ethics shall promptly notify the Member, Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner, the Speaker, the Sergeant-at-Arms, and the Chief Administrative Officer, and shall make such notification publicly available. The Speaker shall promptly lay such notification before the House.

(3) If a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner files an appeal under paragraph (1) prior to the date on which the Committee on Ethics has adopted written rules, the period for the Committee’s consideration of the appeal under paragraph (2) shall begin on the date on which the chair of the Committee notifies the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner that the Committee has adopted such rules.

(c) Deducting fine from pay.— (1) If a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner against whom a fine is imposed by the Sergeant-at-Arms under subsection (a) has not paid the fine prior to the expiration of the 90-calendar day period which begins on the date described in paragraph (2), the Chief Administrative Officer shall deduct the amount of the fine from the net salary otherwise due the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, in accordance with timetables and procedures established by the Committee on House Administration for purposes of carrying out this subsection.

(2) The date described in this paragraph is, with respect to a fine imposed on a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner—

(A) the date of the determination of the Committee on Ethics under subsection (b)(2); or

(B) if the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner does not file an appeal with the Committee on Ethics prior to the expiration of the period specified in subsection (b)(1), the first day after the expiration of such period.

(d) Prohibiting use of campaign or official funds To pay fines.—A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not use campaign funds or official funds, including amounts in the Members’ Representational Allowance, to pay a fine imposed under this resolution.

(e) Policies and procedures.—The Sergeant-at-Arms, Committee on Ethics, Committee on House Administration, and Chief Administrative Officer are authorized to establish policies and procedures for the implementation of this resolution.
Attest:





Clerk.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/73/text

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I doubt their paychecks are the source of their income. n/t Harker Feb 2021 #1
Then double the fine. If needed, redouble it. Third violation is expulsion from Congress ... marble falls Feb 2021 #21
That's more like it. n/t Harker Feb 2021 #31
They should just double it every time LiberalLovinLug Feb 2021 #51
$5000 is still gonna leave a mark. nt Gore1FL Feb 2021 #36
That's okay... Grokenstein Feb 2021 #42
That's true. Harker Feb 2021 #44
There's the real truth to this. PSPS Feb 2021 #54
Do they Rebl2 Feb 2021 #2
Taking bets right now genxlib Feb 2021 #3
The SCOTUS won't take a suit regarding congressional rules, I bet. Gore1FL Feb 2021 #37
cool, Maxheader Feb 2021 #4
Wonder what their families think of this. Or are they all too rich to care Walleye Feb 2021 #6
it would piss bill gates off... Maxheader Feb 2021 #8
I believe it Walleye Feb 2021 #10
They are too Rich to care msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #38
Serious question: Mike Niendorff Feb 2021 #5
I guess the cops don't wanna have to bodyslam a congressman Walleye Feb 2021 #7
Easy fix: Mike Niendorff Feb 2021 #9
If that's what they have to do, it's ok . Maybe they have to come and go through the same spot. Walleye Feb 2021 #12
The CP would have to stand up to them. Hmmm... 33taw Feb 2021 #33
The Reps can still just go through them and not stop obamanut2012 Feb 2021 #48
Let me know when their bribes are no longer enough to cover the fines quakerboy Feb 2021 #11
😁😁 Walleye Feb 2021 #13
Wonder where the money is going from fines assessed Sugarmaggie Feb 2021 #14
Great - we'll be hearing from them in future ailsagirl Feb 2021 #15
So for $5 K ,,, Cryptoad Feb 2021 #16
The arrogance of these people... dawg day Feb 2021 #17
And you're not sure if your coworkers would use the guns to defend you or attack you. tanyev Feb 2021 #25
LOL MySideOfTown Feb 2021 #18
None of this makes sense.... Jon King Feb 2021 #19
I Hope The Rule Is Written So COL Mustard Feb 2021 #20
Silly me, I thought there were laws against carrying guns in government buildings. housecat Feb 2021 #22
What are the chances that these gun nuts Congress critters aren't squirrelling dreamland Feb 2021 #23
Without an arrest or criminal charges the $5k is a license fee, not a fine. Marcuse Feb 2021 #24
Fined? Nocturnowl Feb 2021 #26
Nancy is not for the Play Play. djacq Feb 2021 #27
Gohmert always brags of being a judge, he worked for one of the nations Beachnutt Feb 2021 #28
Gohmert is claiming Pelosi bypassed the detectors. BlueStater Feb 2021 #29
after the first time ShepKat Feb 2021 #30
Did he? invrabbit Feb 2021 #32
guns are prohibited, period. why the pussyfooting. if they bypass, search them. bullimiami Feb 2021 #34
It is illegal to stop them obamanut2012 Feb 2021 #49
I thought Boebert had already been fined. TNNurse Feb 2021 #35
She did the bypass, but it was before the rules were voted on and in place. nt Gore1FL Feb 2021 #39
Congressional aides need to be tested too FakeNoose Feb 2021 #40
They're grandstanding for attention NHvet Feb 2021 #41
They will just raise NRA money to pay this ... TomVilmer Feb 2021 #43
NRA filed for bankruptcy less than a month ago BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #46
What happens with the 3rd plus offense? ananda Feb 2021 #45
It's $10,000 for each subsquent offense after the 1st BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #47
Ok thanks. Well... ananda Feb 2021 #52
Just the fact that they are actually "enforcing" use BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #53
Here's a publicity photo Rep. Andrew Clyde arranged, to impress the voters back home: Judi Lynn Feb 2021 #50
It's a silent insurrection based on the creation of fear and intimidation bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #55
If he would skip this regulation, keithbvadu2 Feb 2021 #56
Aren't they fined for not wearing masks as well? tavernier Feb 2021 #57
What and who are these gun-toting reps afraid of? BarbD Feb 2021 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun seller turned congres...»Reply #47