Latest Breaking News

stopdiggin

(14,437 posts)

9. thank you

Sun Jan 10, 2021, 06:40 PM

Jan 2021

(always appreciate informed opinion and info)
I read this that Congress may perform a role as "tie breaker" -- (in case of a disputed 25th declaration) -- and the other provision being a body (or mechanism) "which Congress may provide" (and, to date, Congress has made no other provisions for implementation of the amendment)

Edit: A "committee" such as Jeffries suggests would need to be enacted and empowered by further legislation (no?)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New video shows rioters attacking Capitol police [View all] blue-wave Jan 2021 OP

I'm just amazed that someone so clearly cowardly, selfish and incompetent as Trump Yeehah Jan 2021 #1

That's a great point. It's possible some of them will be put away for life. C Moon Jan 2021 #15

Kick and recommend for visibility. bronxiteforever Jan 2021 #2

OMG LiberalLovinLug Jan 2021 #3

How is it that the 25th doesn't require the VP? FreepFryer Jan 2021 #4

it is (nt) stopdiggin Jan 2021 #5

It does provide an option for congress to remove blue-wave Jan 2021 #7

thank you stopdiggin Jan 2021 #9

I watched an interview blue-wave Jan 2021 #6

U are misinterpreting the 25th. FreepFryer Jan 2021 #8

Ok, well I am reading what I read blue-wave Jan 2021 #10

your assertion the VP is not required to invoke the 25th is patently false FreepFryer Jan 2021 #11

I'm not sure they want or need to fast track this bucolic_frolic Jan 2021 #13

You missed the word "Thereafter" which starts the paragraph you quoted in the OP muriel_volestrangler Jan 2021 #14

Lame interviewee bucolic_frolic Jan 2021 #12

Where the hell was the sargent of arms Sund while his men were being attacked? onetexan Jan 2021 #16