Latest Breaking News

CrispyQ

(40,419 posts)

10. First we have to win.

Mon Aug 3, 2020, 11:26 AM

Aug 2020

Second, adding seats to SCOTUS would take a kind of daring I haven't seen from our party in years. I hope I'm wrong about Biden, but I don't see him acting with the kind of boldness we need, even if we get him the numbers in Congress. And it's not just Biden. It's all of the old guard dems. I don't think they have come to terms with exactly how anti-American their colleagues across the aisle have become. I hope I'm wrong, but giving John Kasich a speaking spot at our convention feels like we're already trying to reach across the aisle. Let Kasich make an ad, let him host a town hall, but don't give him a spot on our national stage. When Kasich throws his hat into the presidential ring in 2024, one of his first ads will be to show what a moderate he is, with images of him on stage at our convention. We should be promoting our young dems, not make a future ad for some has-been, anti-choice, white guy from the other side.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

80 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats warn GOP: Don't fill a Supreme Court vacancy in 2020 or we'll retaliate [View all] bluewater Aug 2020 OP

That crossed my mind a while back Roc2020 Aug 2020 #1

Plus they could also add more judges to the varies appeals courts. cstanleytech Aug 2020 #34

I didn't think of that Roc2020 Aug 2020 #40

And they might well have to considering the behavior of the Republicans. cstanleytech Aug 2020 #64

This would have to be done prior to the new congress being sworn in ... aggiesal Aug 2020 #46

This is a little scary. Are they anticipating RGB may not survive... brush Aug 2020 #2

McConnell has already declared he would. Harker Aug 2020 #15

Or Thomas plans to retire? JeaneRaye Aug 2020 #18

Why would Thomas retire? llmart Aug 2020 #36

Gotta Protect the Money NonPC Aug 2020 #45

Yep. llmart Aug 2020 #51

Thomas' judicial philosophy has evolved in recent years Zambero Aug 2020 #76

They are hoping and praying that she dies. not_the_one Aug 2020 #31

I do like the Anita Hill recommendation. I'll have my popcorn... brush Aug 2020 #50

I am concerned about this as the SCOTUS may ultimately jimlup Aug 2020 #49

They're pretty much rooting for RGB to die. That's how awful they are. And McConnell Neema Aug 2020 #77

Biden needs to expand SCOTUS to at least 12 seats regardless of what GOP does this year nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 2020 #3

10 or 11 at least. KPN Aug 2020 #5

POTUS can't do that. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2020 #6

Dem congress and Senate can change 9 seat limit, which Biden can sign, then appoint to new seats nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 2020 #25

+1 -K&R onetexan Aug 2020 #32

Odd number. Next reasonable would be 11. LiberalFighter Aug 2020 #28

They already did it. They already manipulated the Court by refusing to consoder Garland in early KPN Aug 2020 #4

"They already did it, they already manipulated the Court" - yup. The Dems already have a perfectly progree Aug 2020 #30

I disagree. I thought this statement was carefully spooky3 Aug 2020 #35

Glad to see they are going to hold the pre-dotard republicans to count. 5X Aug 2020 #7

This!! There actions will have consequences..finally!! Thekaspervote Aug 2020 #27

We (Dems) should send signals like this (post)...then SayItLoud Aug 2020 #8

I see turmoil in the streets if Moscow mitch tries to put another unqualified justice on the bench. KS Toronado Aug 2020 #9

First we have to win. CrispyQ Aug 2020 #10

I agree with all your points 100 percent. klook Aug 2020 #24

Should have retaliated last damn time.... Chicago1980 Aug 2020 #11

+1 n/t area51 Aug 2020 #21

They didn't have the means to retaliate. RussBLib Aug 2020 #44

They should be retaliating regardless of whether the GOP fills a seat this year. StevieM Aug 2020 #12

The GOP doesn't care. They'll rubber stamp Trump's nominee without hearings. Vinca Aug 2020 #13

Kill the filibuster and expand the court. dalton99a Aug 2020 #14

First step in retaliation for Merrick Garland. roamer65 Aug 2020 #16

+1 K&R - get rid of the filibuster & stack the courts w our own liberal judges!! onetexan Aug 2020 #19

And put Merrick Garland in a seat. roamer65 Aug 2020 #20

yes, Garland was cheated out of his SCOTUS appointment. onetexan Aug 2020 #22

++++ agree. fingers crossed we take the senate on Nov 3rd. nt iluvtennis Aug 2020 #26

Mitch will call a lame duck session to crank out more judges. Older judges "will be stepping down" Marcuse Aug 2020 #17

two can play this game. They add one of theirs. We add 2 of ours, or more. onetexan Aug 2020 #23

This is very good news. PatrickforO Aug 2020 #29

I don't understand why any thoughtful person Steelrolled Aug 2020 #33

Merrick Garland says Hello. bluewater Aug 2020 #37

No, we didn't win the Presidency back then. We won the popular vote. Not the same thing. N/T Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #52

Obama was ALREADY President when he nominated Merrick Garland. bluewater Aug 2020 #56

I thought you were referring to the 2016 election, which the person you responded to mentioned. Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #57

Exactly, there is no need to be rude. bluewater Aug 2020 #58

I believe you may wish to check who said what on this thread. Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #59

Oh, my Mistake. I mis-followed the thread. bluewater Aug 2020 #60

Wow. You stay classy there, bluewater. I think we're done here. N/T Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #61

"You stay classy there, bluewater" descends into personal acrimony. Wow, just wow. bluewater Aug 2020 #62

Oh give me a break. Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #63

Tempest in a Tea Kettle? HeartlandProgressive Aug 2020 #65

It was rude and condescending, and nothing I'd said warranted it. Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #68

So your behavior is excusable but you get to call someone else rude? HeartlandProgressive Aug 2020 #71

I got snarky after the non-apology apology, you may note. Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #73

So you are using a Middle School defense? Really? HeartlandProgressive Aug 2020 #74

You get what you give. It really is that simple. N/T Jedi Guy Aug 2020 #79

IT'S ABOUT TIME, DAMMIT!!!!! calimary Aug 2020 #38

It would be very satisfying were Yertle's years-long plan to pack the courts stopbush Aug 2020 #39

This message was self-deleted by its author Illumination Aug 2020 #41

Merrick Garland deserves a long overdue seat! Now the Democrats need to make more NOISE! Illumination Aug 2020 #42

It's almost spine bucolic_frolic Aug 2020 #43

Court-packing didn't work for a statesman like FDR. It's certainly not going to work for Orange Amin sandensea Aug 2020 #47

Actually the threat of increasing the number of judges did work. pecosbob Aug 2020 #66

Thanks for the clarification sandensea Aug 2020 #69

What can they actually do though? Dopers_Greed Aug 2020 #48

I'm a little worried by this Polybius Aug 2020 #53

Yeah, this time we'll use squirt guns BadGimp Aug 2020 #54

DC and PR statehood too, when we prevail. Grasswire2 Aug 2020 #55

Roosevelt achieved passage of the desired legislation simply by making the threat pecosbob Aug 2020 #67

It's about goddamned time they learn to play hard ball. BigDemVoter Aug 2020 #70

I think there is an argument to be made that 9 justices may not be the right number Buckeyeblue Aug 2020 #72

Kavanaugh can be impeached Danascot Aug 2020 #75

I love RBG, but....she should have retired during the eight years of the Obama presidency. mudstump Aug 2020 #78

What crap. Grins Aug 2020 #80