Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Base where Prince Harry is stationed stormed by heavily armed insurgents, two Marines killed [View all]TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)41. Why the hell should it? US spends millions to kill one "insurgent".
They spend a small company of insurgents and a couple of thousand dollars of their own to kill one US soldier, you spend/expend tens of millions chasing the wind and building up ill will by taking revenge on women and children.
And when presented with opportunity, just ONE of them all too often manages to take out several of our own boys, with a weapon we put in his hands for "training purposes".
The United States has already beggared itself pursuing the wars it already has and you want to double down?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Base where Prince Harry is stationed stormed by heavily armed insurgents, two Marines killed [View all]
Lucy Goosey
Sep 2012
OP
I don't buy that for a moment - unit rotations are rarely on that kind of notice.
Posteritatis
Sep 2012
#22
Very responsible of you to post something like that, National Post. Oy. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2012
#4
I simply do not understand why the defensive forces in the bases, embassies and consulates being
spayneuter
Sep 2012
#6
No, it is not. There are insane religious thugs who want to kill people over an insipid 'insult'
spayneuter
Sep 2012
#12
... I'm gonna guess your warfare-related knowledge comes from television or something. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2012
#21
And that showed things are little more complex than this guy's suggesting too, didn't it?
Posteritatis
Sep 2012
#28
Shooting unarmed civilians is always bad for PR, even if they are pissed and storming your facility.
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#10
And shooting at armed not-civilians presents its own unique challenges, too. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2012
#11
Who gives a fuck about PR?? I sure don't. Why should we subsume OUR human rights to a bunch
spayneuter
Sep 2012
#13
Horribly sad. More killings. Someone is certainly destabilizing things in the ME this week..
progressivebydesign
Sep 2012
#18
Bremer, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz - the Four Horse's Asses of the Apocalypse
LiberalEsto
Sep 2012
#37