Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spooky3

(37,934 posts)
6. I think they are missing a key point.
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 10:39 PM
Jan 2017

The point is that the sexism and misogyny are there, whether someone reveals it with a comment or not. Just knowing what "polite discourse" should allow and following the rules or not, is not the biggest challenge. A quiet sexist is still a sexist and if s/he is a legislator, judge, etc., can do serious damage.

As was the case with Pres. Obama, his election lifted the lid off evidence of racism still existing in society. The problem was not just that some people felt free to express racist views. It was that we still have racism and have to address it.

Professor, they're thinking exactly what they are saying. It's not complicated.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sexist, vulgar posts on w...»Reply #6