Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
61. There's something happening here...AFL-CIO issues page - from 2007
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jun 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1777600

I came across this page when looking back on the votes for the China Trade bill in 2000. What is interesting is how the page includes information on the China Trade bill for certain candidates and excludes vote information for other candidates. I would assume this page is compiled for the benefit of their members so why would they be selective on the voting records of the candidates? Does anyone else find this strange?

No mention of the votes that the Dem candidates cast for this bill

YES

Biden
Dodd
Edwards

Bottom line the AFL-CIO page was not entirely accurate or complete




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In my other OP, still no Clinton supporters apologizing for their smears of Bernie as sexist JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #1
I don't think he's a sexist MFM008 Jun 2016 #77
So they let him pick five, as long as they get to pick his choices. Gene Debs Jun 2016 #2
Does this surprise anyone? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #42
Lol, no it doesn't. harun Jun 2016 #86
so they reject a union leader but not Cornell West - interesting azurnoir Jun 2016 #3
I predict a shortage Plucketeer Jun 2016 #47
You are wallyworld2 Jun 2016 #62
This is all about appearances Hillary's labor pick was allowed to stay azurnoir Jun 2016 #72
^ This. Plus 1000. nt TBF Jun 2016 #99
So will they encourage labor to vote republican? katsy Jun 2016 #4
Nixon had labor for the part of the Vietnam war. Mark 750 Jun 2016 #11
I didn't know that. katsy Jun 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Jun 2016 #17
LABOR hasn't had a seat at the Democratic Party table bvar22 Jun 2016 #100
And old Midwest saying just keeps coming to me... libdem4life Jun 2016 #5
That stinks! Harriety Jun 2016 #6
What else would you expect? warrprayer Jun 2016 #7
No Labor? Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #8
They still are a strong focus. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #9
DWS and payday loans dorkzilla Jun 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Jun 2016 #18
They want labor to donate money and vote awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #84
"he was told not to pick anyone else from the labor movement." jomin41 Jun 2016 #10
Yes they do. redwitch Jun 2016 #16
There is union representation on the platform committee. nt Jitter65 Jun 2016 #43
Gee unions, do ya... zentrum Jun 2016 #13
labor rep on the committee - Paul Booth of AFSCME. it is false to claim no labor rep on committee n msongs Jun 2016 #15
Was he a Bernie pick? nt SusanCalvin Jun 2016 #19
That may be ornotna Jun 2016 #21
One labor rep. For government employees only. ebayfool Jun 2016 #36
1 person out of 15 is 8 percent of the committee. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #20
bad math, 1 out of 15 is 6.67% AntiBank Jun 2016 #37
It should be reverse. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #39
The leadership of Labor and only the leadership of Labor Gman Jun 2016 #22
She is leadership. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2016 #23
No, unless Labor put her there, Gman Jun 2016 #26
Labor isn't a monolith. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2016 #30
Are they even in the AFL-CIO? Gman Jun 2016 #33
According to their website dflprincess Jun 2016 #45
Hillary On Video billhicks76 Jun 2016 #74
can you post the link to the video? puffy socks Jun 2016 #80
I'd allege that too were my candidate trailing in second, like you, I'd offer no evidence LanternWaste Jun 2016 #83
Not all unions are AFL-CIO. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #76
Plus won! Enthusiast Jun 2016 #78
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #34
DeMoro and her Nader Nurses don't represent labor, or even Democrats. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #65
Exactly. RoseAnn DeMoro and the Nader Nurses don't speak for labor...or even Democrats. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #56
I'm shocked and chagrined.... blackspade Jun 2016 #24
Screw Labor scottie55 Jun 2016 #25
Giving Bernie the authority to choose five LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #27
Shocking. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #28
What a sham EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #29
Between a labor union that represents more of a slice of the labor movement vs. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #31
Surprise, surprise, surprise. hay rick Jun 2016 #32
Boo freaking hoo Politicub Jun 2016 #35
Didja read the link? No? DNC confirmed what he said. ebayfool Jun 2016 #38
Well ornotna Jun 2016 #40
But you believe every word from habitual liar Ms. Golden Sacks! BillZBubb Jun 2016 #52
The more things change, the more things stay the same. PoliticalMalcontent Jun 2016 #41
This is the party we are supposed to support or else? alarimer Jun 2016 #44
Labor is represented on the Platform Committee. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #46
Once upon a time there was a term "token representation" Tom Rinaldo Jun 2016 #49
I'm not sure Goldman Sachs is a big supporter of labor unions. jalan48 Jun 2016 #48
This lady was eliminated. RoseAnn DeMoro, executive director of National Nurses United EndElectoral Jun 2016 #50
WTF? The Democratic Party is actually denying the voice of labor in their platform.... raindaddy Jun 2016 #51
Welcome to the Third Way! BillZBubb Jun 2016 #53
Sanders was ordered not to pick anyone fom the Labor Movement. That means the Labor Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #54
Sanders' pick was RoseAnn DeMoro, who heads a nurse group super pac supporting Sanders. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #55
Yesterday I read that Time was a right wing publication, the nurses are fighting for HC for all ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #58
What in the Time article is factually incorrect? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #60
You do not have to refute anything in the article, just say it is a right wing publication .. slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #63
I am not defending Time, I am defending facts. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #64
That is what Should be done in every instance, but many are quick to blame a publication ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #67
#bernierules nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #70
I can't respond in the way that I would like jmowreader Jun 2016 #57
Do you also find it overly convenient that the Dems have kept a for profit HC system in place for... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #59
Tell me how Bernie gets buy-in from all of the participants in the healthcare industry jmowreader Jun 2016 #71
The idea isn't "everything gets passed". The idea is we have a voice at the table lostnfound Jun 2016 #85
So being told no repeatedly is fine with you? jmowreader Jun 2016 #90
My husband and I pay $1K/mo for health ins and have for 10 yrs Doremus Jun 2016 #87
How do other nations make this work, these are the questions we need to be asking ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #103
There's something happening here...AFL-CIO issues page - from 2007 slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #61
Oh, you labor leaders who have betrayed your members, Peace Patriot Jun 2016 #66
Bernie's DeMoro betrayed all Dems when she pushed Nader and thus helped elect Dubya. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #68
do really believe we do not remember history? SCOTUS 'elected' W azurnoir Jun 2016 #75
I remember. Naderites' betrayal helped make it close enough to steal. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #81
well the Gore-Bush election was 16 years ago are you saying that the DNC is that vindictive ? azurnoir Jun 2016 #82
The DNC did not exclude her for that. I am pointing out her betrayal, not the DNC. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #91
so what was the DNC's reasoning ? azurnoir Jun 2016 #92
I see you did not read the article. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #93
so the DNC doesn't want labor over represented? azurnoir Jun 2016 #94
The DNC does want labor represented and already HAS labor represented. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #95
so no room at the DNC table for 2 Labor reps I take it azurnoir Jun 2016 #96
It is a small drafting group, I assume they want a broad variety of sectors represented.. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #97
ummmhmmm well seeing as how the Democratic party touts it's union support so much I find it strange azurnoir Jun 2016 #98
Ronald Reagan must be laughing his ass off in hell. clg311 Jun 2016 #69
Whoa...Revolution Is Coming billhicks76 Jun 2016 #73
K&R.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #79
the right wing shanti Jun 2016 #88
Sadly, Kermitt Gribble Jun 2016 #89
Don't need no Bernie Supporters. Don't need no Labor. Lobbyists, Republican Donors, they're OK. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #101
Dafuq? They veto someone who JesterCS Jun 2016 #102
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders: DNC vetoed union...»Reply #61