Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Legal group poised to quiz Clinton aides about email server [View all]karynnj
(60,581 posts)The former shows a plan to thwart legitimate oversight of her State Department. It also echoes her almost certainly hiding the Rose Law Firm records, that showed up in the Clinton part of the White House two years after they were subpoenaed. It was not just lack of judgement -- not realizing that it made the email vulnerable -- it was a plan to enable her to hide anything that could have embarrassed her. (It backfired royally when it became public and we ended up with all her SD email (that her team sorted) online.) This was not by mistake -- it was very likely the intention.
That unfortunately is what this suit is allowed to pursue - Why did she opt to set up a server in her basement to use for State Department email for herself and also for some of her closest aides. She has tried to dismiss this as a "mistake" and also "something everyone did" -- in fact, it was not an accident, it took a fair amount of effort to do and it is likely that many career SD people in charge of IT etc -- who indirectly reported to her -- were told not to do some things that likely were routine -- just as assigning her her government email account and working to archive it. The question I have is whether they questioned this with their boss (likely Cheryl Mills or someone reporting to Cheryl Mills).
There is a HUGE difference between not even having a SD email and some, like Powell, who occasionally used their personal email.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):